Chickasaw vs Paraguayan Community Comparison

COMPARE

Chickasaw
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Paraguayan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Chickasaw

Paraguayans

Fair
Good
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,568
SOCIAL INDEX
73.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
112th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Paraguayan Integration in Chickasaw Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 57,061,156 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Paraguayans within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.337. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.014% in Paraguayans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to a decrease of 13.9 Paraguayans.
Chickasaw Integration in Paraguayan Communities

Chickasaw vs Paraguayan Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Paraguayan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,475 compared to $50,385, a difference of 38.1%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $106,615, a difference of 36.8%), and median household income ($70,005 compared to $95,737, a difference of 36.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 5.2%), householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $64,443, a difference of 19.9%), and householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $55,614, a difference of 24.2%).
Chickasaw vs Paraguayan Income
Income MetricChickasawParaguayan
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$36,475
Exceptional
$50,385
Median Family Income
Tragic
$85,356
Exceptional
$114,016
Median Household Income
Tragic
$70,005
Exceptional
$95,737
Median Earnings
Tragic
$40,672
Exceptional
$51,068
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$47,832
Exceptional
$59,975
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,414
Exceptional
$43,173
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$44,763
Exceptional
$55,614
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$77,929
Exceptional
$106,615
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$82,193
Exceptional
$109,447
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,732
Exceptional
$64,443
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.2%
Average
25.8%

Chickasaw vs Paraguayan Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Paraguayan communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 45.7%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.0% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 42.0%), and single male poverty (16.3% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 40.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 7.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 9.1%), and married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 12.5%).
Chickasaw vs Paraguayan Poverty
Poverty MetricChickasawParaguayan
Poverty
Tragic
14.7%
Exceptional
11.4%
Families
Tragic
10.8%
Exceptional
8.3%
Males
Tragic
13.5%
Exceptional
10.2%
Females
Tragic
15.9%
Exceptional
12.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
24.5%
Exceptional
19.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.0%
Exceptional
12.0%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
21.8%
Exceptional
15.0%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.5%
Exceptional
14.7%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.8%
Exceptional
14.9%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.6%
Exceptional
15.0%
Single Males
Tragic
16.3%
Exceptional
11.6%
Single Females
Tragic
26.3%
Exceptional
19.3%
Single Fathers
Tragic
19.0%
Exceptional
15.2%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.4%
Exceptional
27.2%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.8%
Good
5.1%
Seniors Over 65 years
Good
10.7%
Poor
11.4%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.6%
Poor
12.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.1%
Exceptional
10.7%

Chickasaw vs Paraguayan Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Paraguayan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 28.2%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 21.7%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 1.3%), female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.6%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 2.0%).
Chickasaw vs Paraguayan Unemployment
Unemployment MetricChickasawParaguayan
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Excellent
5.2%
Exceptional
4.9%
Females
Excellent
5.1%
Exceptional
5.1%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.2%
Fair
11.7%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.7%
Tragic
19.4%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Excellent
10.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Fair
6.7%
Good
6.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
4.9%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Good
4.8%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
5.4%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.3%
Good
8.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.0%
Exceptional
7.0%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Tragic
10.2%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.4%
Exceptional
5.2%

Chickasaw vs Paraguayan Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Paraguayan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 33.8%, a difference of 13.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 6.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 0.99%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 4.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 4.9%).
Chickasaw vs Paraguayan Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricChickasawParaguayan
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
62.3%
Exceptional
66.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
76.2%
Exceptional
80.6%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.3%
Tragic
33.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Poor
74.5%
Tragic
73.7%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
81.9%
Exceptional
85.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.9%
Exceptional
85.8%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
80.9%
Exceptional
85.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
79.0%
Exceptional
83.5%

Chickasaw vs Paraguayan Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Paraguayan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 34.1%), divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 23.9%), and births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 22.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 0.50%), average family size (3.19 compared to 3.20, a difference of 0.51%), and currently married (46.6% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 1.2%).
Chickasaw vs Paraguayan Family Structure
Family Structure MetricChickasawParaguayan
Family Households
Good
64.4%
Fair
64.1%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.2%
Tragic
27.1%
Married-couple Households
Fair
45.9%
Good
47.0%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.19
Poor
3.20
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.8%
Exceptional
2.1%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.0%
Exceptional
5.8%
Currently Married
Average
46.6%
Good
47.2%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
14.2%
Exceptional
11.5%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.3%
Exceptional
29.7%

Chickasaw vs Paraguayan Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Paraguayan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 82.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 50.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 34.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 85.7%, a difference of 7.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 50.3%, a difference of 17.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 34.1%).
Chickasaw vs Paraguayan Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricChickasawParaguayan
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.9%
Tragic
14.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.3%
Tragic
85.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.0%
Tragic
50.3%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.2%
Tragic
16.6%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.4%
Tragic
4.9%

Chickasaw vs Paraguayan Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Paraguayan communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 74.4%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 64.7%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 51.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (94.1% compared to 93.7%, a difference of 0.39%), 11th grade (92.3% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 0.39%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.49%).
Chickasaw vs Paraguayan Education Level
Education Level MetricChickasawParaguayan
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Fair
2.2%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.4%
Fair
97.9%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.4%
Fair
97.9%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Fair
97.9%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Fair
97.8%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Fair
97.7%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Fair
97.4%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Fair
97.3%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Fair
96.9%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Fair
95.9%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Fair
95.5%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.5%
Fair
94.7%
10th Grade
Excellent
94.1%
Average
93.7%
11th Grade
Fair
92.3%
Good
92.7%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.3%
Good
91.5%
High School Diploma
Poor
88.4%
Good
89.5%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.8%
Excellent
86.5%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
60.4%
Exceptional
67.9%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.3%
Exceptional
62.9%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.6%
Exceptional
51.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.4%
Exceptional
44.0%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.4%
Exceptional
18.8%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.4%
Exceptional
5.9%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
2.3%

Chickasaw vs Paraguayan Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Paraguayan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 68.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 63.9%), and vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 56.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 10.1%), disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 13.5%), and disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 45.0%, a difference of 13.8%).
Chickasaw vs Paraguayan Disability
Disability MetricChickasawParaguayan
Disability
Tragic
15.2%
Exceptional
10.6%
Males
Tragic
15.1%
Exceptional
10.1%
Females
Tragic
15.2%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.7%
Tragic
2.0%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.8%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.0%
Exceptional
5.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.1%
Exceptional
9.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
30.2%
Exceptional
20.5%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
51.2%
Exceptional
45.0%
Vision
Tragic
3.2%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Tragic
4.5%
Exceptional
2.7%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.5%
Exceptional
16.8%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.0%
Exceptional
5.5%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.9%
Exceptional
2.3%