Chickasaw vs Egyptian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Egyptian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chickasaw
Egyptians
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,596
SOCIAL INDEX
83.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
61st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Egyptian Integration in Chickasaw Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 107,931,734 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Egyptians within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.056. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Egyptians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to a decrease of 2.1 Egyptians.
Chickasaw vs Egyptian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Egyptian communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($70,005 compared to $95,673, a difference of 36.7%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $112,256, a difference of 36.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $105,282, a difference of 35.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 2.2%), householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $54,444, a difference of 21.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $65,441, a difference of 21.8%).
Income Metric | Chickasaw | Egyptian |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,475 | Exceptional $48,358 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $85,356 | Exceptional $114,119 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,005 | Exceptional $95,673 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,672 | Exceptional $51,701 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,832 | Exceptional $61,095 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,414 | Exceptional $43,305 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,763 | Exceptional $54,444 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,929 | Exceptional $105,282 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,193 | Exceptional $112,256 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,732 | Exceptional $65,441 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.2% | Poor 26.6% |
Chickasaw vs Egyptian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Egyptian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 46.0%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 42.9%), and single male poverty (16.3% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 41.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 2.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 4.3%), and married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 19.4%).
Poverty Metric | Chickasaw | Egyptian |
Poverty | Tragic 14.7% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Exceptional 8.1% |
Males | Tragic 13.5% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Females | Tragic 15.9% | Exceptional 12.3% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.5% | Exceptional 18.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.0% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.8% | Exceptional 14.9% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Exceptional 14.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.8% | Exceptional 14.7% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Exceptional 14.7% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.3% | Exceptional 11.5% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.3% | Exceptional 19.1% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.0% | Exceptional 14.7% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.4% | Exceptional 26.9% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Excellent 10.5% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Average 12.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.1% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Chickasaw vs Egyptian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Egyptian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 26.3%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 19.3%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.49%), male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.73%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 1.5%).
Unemployment Metric | Chickasaw | Egyptian |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Good 5.2% |
Males | Excellent 5.2% | Good 5.2% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Good 5.2% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Fair 11.7% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Average 17.5% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Fair 10.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.7% | Exceptional 6.4% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.2% | Excellent 5.3% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Average 4.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 5.5% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.3% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.3% | Exceptional 8.1% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.0% | Exceptional 7.1% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Excellent 5.3% |
Chickasaw vs Egyptian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Egyptian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 11.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 6.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 1.0%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 3.9%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chickasaw | Egyptian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.3% | Exceptional 66.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.2% | Exceptional 80.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.3% | Tragic 34.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Tragic 73.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.9% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.9% | Exceptional 84.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.0% | Exceptional 83.5% |
Chickasaw vs Egyptian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Egyptian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 33.1%), births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 28.5%), and divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 28.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.2% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 1.3%), average family size (3.19 compared to 3.23, a difference of 1.4%), and family households (64.4% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 1.6%).
Family Structure Metric | Chickasaw | Egyptian |
Family Households | Good 64.4% | Exceptional 65.4% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.2% | Exceptional 28.6% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 45.9% | Exceptional 48.2% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Average 3.23 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Currently Married | Average 46.6% | Exceptional 47.9% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.2% | Exceptional 11.1% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.3% | Exceptional 28.2% |
Chickasaw vs Egyptian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Egyptian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 51.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 21.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 17.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 88.2%, a difference of 4.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 54.3%, a difference of 8.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 17.0%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chickasaw | Egyptian |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Tragic 11.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Tragic 88.2% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.0% | Poor 54.3% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.2% | Poor 19.0% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Fair 6.1% |
Chickasaw vs Egyptian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Egyptian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 56.4%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 54.1%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 44.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (94.1% compared to 94.0%, a difference of 0.040%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.44%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.45%).
Education Level Metric | Chickasaw | Egyptian |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Average 2.1% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Average 98.0% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Average 97.9% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Average 97.9% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Average 97.9% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Average 97.7% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Average 97.5% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Average 97.3% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Average 97.1% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Average 96.1% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Average 95.8% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Good 95.0% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Good 94.0% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Excellent 93.0% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.3% | Exceptional 91.9% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.4% | Exceptional 89.9% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.8% | Exceptional 87.1% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.4% | Exceptional 68.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.3% | Exceptional 63.1% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Exceptional 50.9% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.4% | Exceptional 43.3% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Exceptional 17.6% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Chickasaw vs Egyptian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Egyptian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 66.2%), vision disability (3.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 64.8%), and hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 64.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 10.9%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 46.1%, a difference of 11.0%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 23.4%).
Disability Metric | Chickasaw | Egyptian |
Disability | Tragic 15.2% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Females | Tragic 15.2% | Exceptional 11.1% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.8% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Exceptional 9.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Exceptional 21.6% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.2% | Exceptional 46.1% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Exceptional 1.9% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Exceptional 2.7% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.5% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.0% | Exceptional 5.6% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Exceptional 2.3% |