Chickasaw vs Egyptian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Chickasaw
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Egyptian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Chickasaw

Egyptians

Fair
Excellent
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,596
SOCIAL INDEX
83.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
61st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Egyptian Integration in Chickasaw Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 107,931,734 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Egyptians within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.056. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Egyptians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to a decrease of 2.1 Egyptians.
Chickasaw Integration in Egyptian Communities

Chickasaw vs Egyptian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Egyptian communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($70,005 compared to $95,673, a difference of 36.7%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $112,256, a difference of 36.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $105,282, a difference of 35.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 2.2%), householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $54,444, a difference of 21.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $65,441, a difference of 21.8%).
Chickasaw vs Egyptian Income
Income MetricChickasawEgyptian
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$36,475
Exceptional
$48,358
Median Family Income
Tragic
$85,356
Exceptional
$114,119
Median Household Income
Tragic
$70,005
Exceptional
$95,673
Median Earnings
Tragic
$40,672
Exceptional
$51,701
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$47,832
Exceptional
$61,095
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,414
Exceptional
$43,305
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$44,763
Exceptional
$54,444
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$77,929
Exceptional
$105,282
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$82,193
Exceptional
$112,256
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,732
Exceptional
$65,441
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.2%
Poor
26.6%

Chickasaw vs Egyptian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Egyptian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 46.0%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 42.9%), and single male poverty (16.3% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 41.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 2.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 4.3%), and married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 19.4%).
Chickasaw vs Egyptian Poverty
Poverty MetricChickasawEgyptian
Poverty
Tragic
14.7%
Exceptional
11.3%
Families
Tragic
10.8%
Exceptional
8.1%
Males
Tragic
13.5%
Exceptional
10.3%
Females
Tragic
15.9%
Exceptional
12.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
24.5%
Exceptional
18.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.0%
Exceptional
11.9%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
21.8%
Exceptional
14.9%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.5%
Exceptional
14.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.8%
Exceptional
14.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.6%
Exceptional
14.7%
Single Males
Tragic
16.3%
Exceptional
11.5%
Single Females
Tragic
26.3%
Exceptional
19.1%
Single Fathers
Tragic
19.0%
Exceptional
14.7%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.4%
Exceptional
26.9%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Good
10.7%
Excellent
10.5%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.6%
Average
12.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.1%
Exceptional
10.0%

Chickasaw vs Egyptian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Egyptian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 26.3%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 19.3%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.49%), male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.73%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 1.5%).
Chickasaw vs Egyptian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricChickasawEgyptian
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Good
5.2%
Males
Excellent
5.2%
Good
5.2%
Females
Excellent
5.1%
Good
5.2%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.2%
Fair
11.7%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.7%
Average
17.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Fair
10.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Fair
6.7%
Exceptional
6.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.2%
Excellent
5.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
4.9%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Average
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Good
4.8%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
5.5%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
5.3%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.3%
Exceptional
8.1%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.0%
Exceptional
7.1%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Exceptional
8.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.4%
Excellent
5.3%

Chickasaw vs Egyptian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Egyptian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 11.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 6.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 1.0%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 3.9%).
Chickasaw vs Egyptian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricChickasawEgyptian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
62.3%
Exceptional
66.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
76.2%
Exceptional
80.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.3%
Tragic
34.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Poor
74.5%
Tragic
73.7%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
81.9%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.9%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
80.9%
Exceptional
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
79.0%
Exceptional
83.5%

Chickasaw vs Egyptian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Egyptian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 33.1%), births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 28.5%), and divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 28.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.2% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 1.3%), average family size (3.19 compared to 3.23, a difference of 1.4%), and family households (64.4% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 1.6%).
Chickasaw vs Egyptian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricChickasawEgyptian
Family Households
Good
64.4%
Exceptional
65.4%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.2%
Exceptional
28.6%
Married-couple Households
Fair
45.9%
Exceptional
48.2%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.19
Average
3.23
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.8%
Exceptional
2.1%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.0%
Exceptional
5.9%
Currently Married
Average
46.6%
Exceptional
47.9%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
14.2%
Exceptional
11.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.3%
Exceptional
28.2%

Chickasaw vs Egyptian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Egyptian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 51.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 21.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 17.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 88.2%, a difference of 4.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 54.3%, a difference of 8.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 17.0%).
Chickasaw vs Egyptian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricChickasawEgyptian
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.9%
Tragic
11.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.3%
Tragic
88.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.0%
Poor
54.3%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.2%
Poor
19.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.4%
Fair
6.1%

Chickasaw vs Egyptian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Egyptian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 56.4%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 54.1%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 44.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (94.1% compared to 94.0%, a difference of 0.040%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.44%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.45%).
Chickasaw vs Egyptian Education Level
Education Level MetricChickasawEgyptian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Average
2.1%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.4%
Average
98.0%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.4%
Average
97.9%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Average
97.9%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Average
97.9%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Average
97.7%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Average
97.5%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Average
97.3%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Average
97.1%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Average
96.1%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Average
95.8%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.5%
Good
95.0%
10th Grade
Excellent
94.1%
Good
94.0%
11th Grade
Fair
92.3%
Excellent
93.0%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.3%
Exceptional
91.9%
High School Diploma
Poor
88.4%
Exceptional
89.9%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.8%
Exceptional
87.1%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
60.4%
Exceptional
68.3%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.3%
Exceptional
63.1%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.6%
Exceptional
50.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.4%
Exceptional
43.3%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.4%
Exceptional
17.6%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.4%
Exceptional
5.3%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
2.2%

Chickasaw vs Egyptian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Egyptian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 66.2%), vision disability (3.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 64.8%), and hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 64.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 10.9%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 46.1%, a difference of 11.0%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 23.4%).
Chickasaw vs Egyptian Disability
Disability MetricChickasawEgyptian
Disability
Tragic
15.2%
Exceptional
10.6%
Males
Tragic
15.1%
Exceptional
10.1%
Females
Tragic
15.2%
Exceptional
11.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.7%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.8%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.0%
Exceptional
5.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.1%
Exceptional
9.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
30.2%
Exceptional
21.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
51.2%
Exceptional
46.1%
Vision
Tragic
3.2%
Exceptional
1.9%
Hearing
Tragic
4.5%
Exceptional
2.7%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.5%
Exceptional
16.7%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.0%
Exceptional
5.6%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.9%
Exceptional
2.3%