Chickasaw vs Iraqi Community Comparison

COMPARE

Chickasaw
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Iraqi
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Chickasaw

Iraqis

Fair
Average
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
5,167
SOCIAL INDEX
49.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
183rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Iraqi Integration in Chickasaw Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 86,381,413 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Iraqis within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.319. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.069% in Iraqis. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to a decrease of 69.2 Iraqis.
Chickasaw Integration in Iraqi Communities

Chickasaw vs Iraqi Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Iraqi communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $99,387, a difference of 20.9%), median household income ($70,005 compared to $83,753, a difference of 19.6%), and median family income ($85,356 compared to $100,658, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 2.0%), median female earnings ($34,414 compared to $38,666, a difference of 12.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $60,466, a difference of 12.5%).
Chickasaw vs Iraqi Income
Income MetricChickasawIraqi
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$36,475
Fair
$42,760
Median Family Income
Tragic
$85,356
Fair
$100,658
Median Household Income
Tragic
$70,005
Fair
$83,753
Median Earnings
Tragic
$40,672
Fair
$46,140
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$47,832
Average
$54,182
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,414
Poor
$38,666
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$44,763
Tragic
$50,802
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$77,929
Poor
$90,764
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$82,193
Fair
$99,387
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,732
Fair
$60,466
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.2%
Poor
26.6%

Chickasaw vs Iraqi Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Iraqi communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.3% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 32.7%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.0% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 28.8%), and single female poverty (26.3% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 26.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.80%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 0.93%), and married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 1.3%).
Chickasaw vs Iraqi Poverty
Poverty MetricChickasawIraqi
Poverty
Tragic
14.7%
Fair
12.7%
Families
Tragic
10.8%
Fair
9.3%
Males
Tragic
13.5%
Poor
11.7%
Females
Tragic
15.9%
Fair
13.7%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
24.5%
Average
20.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.0%
Good
13.2%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
21.8%
Poor
18.0%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.5%
Tragic
17.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.8%
Tragic
17.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.6%
Poor
17.4%
Single Males
Tragic
16.3%
Exceptional
12.3%
Single Females
Tragic
26.3%
Good
20.8%
Single Fathers
Tragic
19.0%
Exceptional
15.9%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.4%
Good
28.8%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
5.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Good
10.7%
Excellent
10.6%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.6%
Excellent
11.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.1%
Fair
12.2%

Chickasaw vs Iraqi Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Iraqi communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 34.9%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 22.8%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.7% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 1.7%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 2.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 2.5%).
Chickasaw vs Iraqi Unemployment
Unemployment MetricChickasawIraqi
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Poor
5.4%
Males
Excellent
5.2%
Fair
5.4%
Females
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
5.5%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.2%
Good
11.5%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.7%
Exceptional
16.4%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Average
10.3%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Fair
6.7%
Exceptional
6.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
4.9%
Average
4.7%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
4.7%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Good
4.8%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.3%
Tragic
9.9%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.0%
Exceptional
7.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Exceptional
8.4%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.4%
Fair
5.5%

Chickasaw vs Iraqi Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Iraqi communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 5.4%), in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 0.78%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 76.0%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 2.4%).
Chickasaw vs Iraqi Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricChickasawIraqi
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
62.3%
Exceptional
65.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
76.2%
Poor
79.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.3%
Exceptional
38.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Poor
74.5%
Exceptional
76.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
81.9%
Tragic
83.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.9%
Tragic
83.8%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
80.9%
Tragic
83.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
79.0%
Tragic
82.2%

Chickasaw vs Iraqi Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Iraqi communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 31.7%), single father households (2.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 27.1%), and divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 0.080%), currently married (46.6% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 0.70%), and family households with children (28.2% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 0.94%).
Chickasaw vs Iraqi Family Structure
Family Structure MetricChickasawIraqi
Family Households
Good
64.4%
Average
64.4%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.2%
Exceptional
28.5%
Married-couple Households
Fair
45.9%
Good
46.9%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.19
Good
3.24
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.8%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.0%
Good
6.1%
Currently Married
Average
46.6%
Good
46.9%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
14.2%
Exceptional
11.8%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.3%
Exceptional
27.6%

Chickasaw vs Iraqi Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Iraqi communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 19.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 13.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 57.1%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 0.35%), no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 1.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 57.1%, a difference of 3.4%).
Chickasaw vs Iraqi Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricChickasawIraqi
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.9%
Exceptional
7.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.3%
Exceptional
91.9%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.0%
Exceptional
57.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.2%
Average
19.6%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.4%
Fair
6.2%

Chickasaw vs Iraqi Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Iraqi communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 39.2%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 35.7%), and professional degree (3.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 35.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (94.1% compared to 93.9%, a difference of 0.18%), 11th grade (92.3% compared to 92.8%, a difference of 0.45%), and 9th grade (95.5% compared to 94.9%, a difference of 0.60%).
Chickasaw vs Iraqi Education Level
Education Level MetricChickasawIraqi
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Tragic
2.4%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.7%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.7%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.7%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.6%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.5%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
97.3%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Poor
97.1%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Poor
96.8%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Average
96.0%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Average
95.7%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.5%
Average
94.9%
10th Grade
Excellent
94.1%
Good
93.9%
11th Grade
Fair
92.3%
Good
92.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.3%
Good
91.5%
High School Diploma
Poor
88.4%
Good
89.5%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.8%
Good
86.2%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
60.4%
Excellent
66.8%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.3%
Excellent
60.7%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.6%
Good
47.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.4%
Good
39.0%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.4%
Good
15.5%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.4%
Good
4.5%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Average
1.8%

Chickasaw vs Iraqi Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Iraqi communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 50.4%), vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 48.5%), and hearing disability (4.5% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 44.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 3.9%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 48.6%, a difference of 5.4%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 11.4%).
Chickasaw vs Iraqi Disability
Disability MetricChickasawIraqi
Disability
Tragic
15.2%
Fair
11.8%
Males
Tragic
15.1%
Fair
11.3%
Females
Tragic
15.2%
Fair
12.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.7%
Exceptional
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.8%
Average
5.6%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.0%
Fair
6.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.1%
Fair
11.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
30.2%
Tragic
24.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
51.2%
Tragic
48.6%
Vision
Tragic
3.2%
Good
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
4.5%
Poor
3.1%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.5%
Tragic
17.8%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.0%
Good
6.1%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.9%
Tragic
2.6%