Chickasaw vs Colombian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 132,236,177 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Colombians within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.182. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.014% in Colombians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to a decrease of 13.9 Colombians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Colombian communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($70,005 compared to $85,716, a difference of 22.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $99,772, a difference of 21.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $94,565, a difference of 21.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $58,851, a difference of 9.5%), wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 9.9%), and median male earnings ($47,832 compared to $53,832, a difference of 12.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Colombian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 38.5%), single male poverty (16.3% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 34.2%), and single female poverty (26.3% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 31.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 3.7%), married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 4.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 17.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Colombian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 21.4%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 19.5%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.18%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.0%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Colombian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 33.8%, a difference of 13.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 5.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 73.5%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Colombian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 17.5%), divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 14.7%), and births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 32.2%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.2% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 0.20%), currently married (46.6% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 0.62%), and married-couple households (45.9% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Colombian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 34.2%), no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 27.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 24.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 88.0%, a difference of 4.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 52.9%, a difference of 11.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 24.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Colombian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 37.6%), professional degree (3.4% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 37.0%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 33.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (90.3% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 0.11%), high school diploma (88.4% compared to 88.1%, a difference of 0.42%), and 11th grade (92.3% compared to 91.7%, a difference of 0.68%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Colombian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 63.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 63.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 53.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 9.6%), cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 11.3%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 19.0%).