Arapaho vs Immigrants from China Community Comparison
COMPARE
Arapaho
Immigrants from China
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Arapaho
Immigrants from China
2,537
SOCIAL INDEX
22.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
252nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,289
SOCIAL INDEX
70.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
125th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from China Integration in Arapaho Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 28,327,026 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China within Arapaho communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.671. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Arapaho within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.106% in Immigrants from China. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Arapaho corresponds to a decrease of 105.9 Immigrants from China.
Arapaho vs Immigrants from China Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($32,345 compared to $54,264, a difference of 67.8%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($71,697 compared to $119,756, a difference of 67.0%), and median male earnings ($41,758 compared to $67,353, a difference of 61.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (23.5% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 13.7%), householder income over 65 years ($59,383 compared to $69,174, a difference of 16.5%), and householder income under 25 years ($44,003 compared to $57,931, a difference of 31.7%).
Income Metric | Arapaho | Immigrants from China |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $32,345 | Exceptional $54,264 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $82,064 | Exceptional $125,540 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $67,965 | Exceptional $105,335 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $36,586 | Exceptional $56,638 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $41,758 | Exceptional $67,353 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $31,489 | Exceptional $46,972 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,003 | Exceptional $57,931 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $71,697 | Exceptional $119,756 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $75,945 | Exceptional $122,178 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Poor $59,383 | Exceptional $69,174 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 23.5% | Poor 26.7% |
Arapaho vs Immigrants from China Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (21.9% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 92.8%), child poverty under the age of 5 (23.1% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 70.0%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (21.7% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 62.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.6% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 1.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.7% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 4.1%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.2% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 24.8%).
Poverty Metric | Arapaho | Immigrants from China |
Poverty | Tragic 16.3% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Families | Tragic 12.7% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Excellent 10.7% |
Females | Tragic 17.5% | Exceptional 12.5% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 25.2% | Average 20.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.8% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 23.1% | Exceptional 13.6% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 20.8% | Exceptional 13.3% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 20.2% | Exceptional 13.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 21.7% | Exceptional 13.4% |
Single Males | Tragic 21.9% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.4% | Exceptional 18.1% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 24.0% | Exceptional 14.9% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 33.4% | Exceptional 26.1% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.6% | Excellent 5.0% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 11.6% | Tragic 11.5% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Poor 12.7% | Tragic 13.2% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 14.1% | Exceptional 9.6% |
Arapaho vs Immigrants from China Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (19.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 205.7%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (12.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 150.2%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (15.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 145.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.87%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.1% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 3.7%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 7.7%).
Unemployment Metric | Arapaho | Immigrants from China |
Unemployment | Tragic 9.8% | Good 5.2% |
Males | Tragic 11.0% | Good 5.2% |
Females | Tragic 8.8% | Good 5.2% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 16.3% | Average 11.6% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 25.2% | Good 17.5% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 13.8% | Fair 10.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 15.4% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 12.8% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 10.3% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 7.5% | Average 4.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 6.1% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 6.3% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.8% | Fair 5.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.3% | Poor 5.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.1% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 19.0% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 16.8% | Exceptional 7.7% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 9.2% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Arapaho vs Immigrants from China Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.3% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 19.7%), in labor force | age 25-29 (76.6% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 10.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (78.1% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 3.8%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.5% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (62.1% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 5.2%).
Labor Participation Metric | Arapaho | Immigrants from China |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.1% | Excellent 65.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 74.4% | Good 79.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Excellent 37.3% | Tragic 31.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 73.8% | Tragic 71.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 76.6% | Average 84.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.5% | Exceptional 85.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 78.1% | Exceptional 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 77.1% | Exceptional 83.2% |
Arapaho vs Immigrants from China Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (47.1% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 90.9%), single father households (2.9% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 57.2%), and divorced or separated (14.8% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 47.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.5% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 2.8%), family households with children (25.6% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 7.3%), and average family size (3.64 compared to 3.23, a difference of 12.6%).
Family Structure Metric | Arapaho | Immigrants from China |
Family Households | Exceptional 66.5% | Excellent 64.7% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 25.6% | Average 27.4% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 41.8% | Exceptional 48.4% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.64 | Average 3.23 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.9% | Exceptional 1.8% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.1% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Currently Married | Tragic 40.5% | Exceptional 47.9% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.8% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 47.1% | Exceptional 24.7% |
Arapaho vs Immigrants from China Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 106.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 55.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 45.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.7% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 9.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.2% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 17.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 45.2%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Arapaho | Immigrants from China |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Tragic 15.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.7% | Tragic 84.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 60.2% | Tragic 51.5% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 26.4% | Tragic 18.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.4% | Poor 6.0% |
Arapaho vs Immigrants from China Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 164.6%), professional degree (2.9% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 134.0%), and master's degree (10.0% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 111.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.4% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.12%), high school diploma (88.6% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 0.81%), and 12th grade, no diploma (90.5% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 0.91%).
Education Level Metric | Arapaho | Immigrants from China |
No Schooling Completed | Average 2.1% | Tragic 2.6% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.6% | Tragic 97.5% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.6% | Tragic 97.4% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.6% | Tragic 97.4% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 97.3% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.2% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 97.0% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Tragic 96.8% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Tragic 96.4% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.8% | Tragic 95.3% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.6% | Tragic 95.0% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.7% | Tragic 94.3% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.2% | Tragic 93.2% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.4% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.5% | Good 91.3% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.6% | Good 89.3% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 82.8% | Exceptional 86.9% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.3% | Exceptional 70.9% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 54.1% | Exceptional 66.4% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 36.7% | Exceptional 55.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 26.6% | Exceptional 48.4% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 10.0% | Exceptional 21.2% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 2.9% | Exceptional 6.7% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.2% | Exceptional 3.1% |
Arapaho vs Immigrants from China Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (15.1% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 73.2%), hearing disability (4.1% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 58.1%), and vision disability (2.6% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 42.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 0.48%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 4.7%), and disability age over 75 (49.8% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 7.6%).
Disability Metric | Arapaho | Immigrants from China |
Disability | Tragic 13.2% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Males | Tragic 13.3% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Females | Tragic 13.0% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | Under 5 years | Fair 1.3% | Exceptional 0.96% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.1% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 15.1% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 28.1% | Exceptional 20.3% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 49.8% | Exceptional 46.3% |
Vision | Tragic 2.6% | Exceptional 1.8% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.1% | Exceptional 2.6% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.8% | Exceptional 16.9% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.1% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Exceptional 2.3% |