Colville vs Immigrants from China Community Comparison

COMPARE

Colville
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from China
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBurmeseCanadianCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLithuanianLuxembourgerMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSerbianShoshoneSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTsimshianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ik
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBelarusBelgiumBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCubaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGuatemalaHondurasHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNorth AmericaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSwitzerlandTaiwanThailandTurkeyUgandaUkraineVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaire
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Colville

Immigrants from China

Poor
Good
1,752
SOCIAL INDEX
15.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
289th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,289
SOCIAL INDEX
70.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
125th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from China Integration in Colville Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 33,868,558 people shows a very strong negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China within Colville communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.892. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Colville within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 1.524% in Immigrants from China. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Colville corresponds to a decrease of 1,524.0 Immigrants from China.
Colville Integration in Immigrants from China Communities

Colville vs Immigrants from China Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Colville and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($70,094 compared to $105,335, a difference of 50.3%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,474 compared to $122,178, a difference of 48.1%), and median family income ($85,792 compared to $125,540, a difference of 46.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($49,774 compared to $57,931, a difference of 16.4%), median female earnings ($37,514 compared to $46,972, a difference of 25.2%), and wage/income gap (21.3% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 25.4%).
Colville vs Immigrants from China Income
Income MetricColvilleImmigrants from China
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$38,047
Exceptional
$54,264
Median Family Income
Tragic
$85,792
Exceptional
$125,540
Median Household Income
Tragic
$70,094
Exceptional
$105,335
Median Earnings
Tragic
$42,151
Exceptional
$56,638
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$48,516
Exceptional
$67,353
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$37,514
Exceptional
$46,972
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$49,774
Exceptional
$57,931
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$82,604
Exceptional
$119,756
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$82,474
Exceptional
$122,178
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$51,739
Exceptional
$69,174
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
21.3%
Poor
26.7%

Colville vs Immigrants from China Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Colville and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (18.3% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 91.6%), child poverty under the age of 5 (25.7% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 88.8%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (24.1% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 77.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.2% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 15.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (13.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 17.6%), and married-couple family poverty (6.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 26.6%).
Colville vs Immigrants from China Poverty
Poverty MetricColvilleImmigrants from China
Poverty
Tragic
16.6%
Exceptional
11.6%
Families
Tragic
13.0%
Exceptional
7.8%
Males
Tragic
15.2%
Excellent
10.7%
Females
Tragic
17.8%
Exceptional
12.5%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
29.0%
Average
20.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.5%
Exceptional
11.2%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
25.7%
Exceptional
13.6%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
23.0%
Exceptional
13.3%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
24.1%
Exceptional
13.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
22.5%
Exceptional
13.4%
Single Males
Tragic
18.4%
Exceptional
11.4%
Single Females
Tragic
29.1%
Exceptional
18.1%
Single Fathers
Tragic
21.4%
Exceptional
14.9%
Single Mothers
Tragic
39.3%
Exceptional
26.1%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.3%
Excellent
5.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
13.5%
Tragic
11.5%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
15.2%
Tragic
13.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
18.3%
Exceptional
9.6%

Colville vs Immigrants from China Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Colville and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (11.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 79.2%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (9.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 76.5%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (29.7% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 70.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.18%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 0.77%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 4.5%).
Colville vs Immigrants from China Unemployment
Unemployment MetricColvilleImmigrants from China
Unemployment
Tragic
6.6%
Good
5.2%
Males
Tragic
7.4%
Good
5.2%
Females
Tragic
6.0%
Good
5.2%
Youth < 25
Tragic
16.8%
Average
11.6%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
29.7%
Good
17.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.6%
Fair
10.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
9.2%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
9.0%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
7.4%
Average
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
6.7%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.7%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
5.4%
Fair
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.4%
Poor
5.2%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.7%
Exceptional
7.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
11.2%
Exceptional
6.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
12.3%
Exceptional
7.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
7.4%
Exceptional
4.9%

Colville vs Immigrants from China Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Colville and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 23.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (59.8% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 9.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (74.8% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (81.6% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 3.6%), in labor force | age 35-44 (81.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (73.9% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 4.0%).
Colville vs Immigrants from China Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricColvilleImmigrants from China
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
59.8%
Excellent
65.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
74.8%
Good
79.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.3%
Tragic
31.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
73.9%
Tragic
71.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
81.6%
Average
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
80.7%
Exceptional
85.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
81.7%
Exceptional
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
79.5%
Exceptional
83.2%

Colville vs Immigrants from China Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Colville and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (45.3% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 83.6%), single father households (3.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 78.5%), and single mother households (8.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 58.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.2% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 2.5%), average family size (3.14 compared to 3.23, a difference of 2.9%), and family households with children (26.2% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 4.6%).
Colville vs Immigrants from China Family Structure
Family Structure MetricColvilleImmigrants from China
Family Households
Tragic
63.2%
Excellent
64.7%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.2%
Average
27.4%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
41.0%
Exceptional
48.4%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.14
Average
3.23
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.3%
Exceptional
1.8%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.0%
Exceptional
5.1%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.4%
Exceptional
47.9%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
14.2%
Exceptional
10.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
45.3%
Exceptional
24.7%

Colville vs Immigrants from China Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Colville and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (11.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 84.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (25.8% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 41.5%), and no vehicles in household (13.7% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.8% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 2.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.6% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 8.0%), and no vehicles in household (13.7% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 10.7%).
Colville vs Immigrants from China Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricColvilleImmigrants from China
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
13.7%
Tragic
15.2%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
86.8%
Tragic
84.9%
2+ Vehicles Available
Good
55.6%
Tragic
51.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
25.8%
Tragic
18.2%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
11.1%
Poor
6.0%

Colville vs Immigrants from China Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Colville and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 88.8%), master's degree (11.6% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 81.9%), and professional degree (3.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 75.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.2% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.050%), 10th grade (93.6% compared to 93.2%, a difference of 0.52%), and 9th grade (94.9% compared to 94.3%, a difference of 0.72%).
Colville vs Immigrants from China Education Level
Education Level MetricColvilleImmigrants from China
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.9%
Tragic
2.6%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.5%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.4%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.4%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
97.3%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
97.2%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Tragic
97.0%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Tragic
96.8%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Tragic
96.4%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Tragic
95.3%
8th Grade
Excellent
96.0%
Tragic
95.0%
9th Grade
Average
94.9%
Tragic
94.3%
10th Grade
Fair
93.6%
Tragic
93.2%
11th Grade
Fair
92.2%
Fair
92.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.1%
Good
91.3%
High School Diploma
Tragic
88.3%
Good
89.3%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.4%
Exceptional
86.9%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
62.1%
Exceptional
70.9%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
54.1%
Exceptional
66.4%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.5%
Exceptional
55.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
29.0%
Exceptional
48.4%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.6%
Exceptional
21.2%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.8%
Exceptional
6.7%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.6%
Exceptional
3.1%

Colville vs Immigrants from China Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Colville and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (3.3% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 241.1%), hearing disability (5.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 103.8%), and disability age 35 to 64 (15.8% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 82.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 8.4%), disability age over 75 (55.4% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 19.6%), and self-care disability (3.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 33.6%).
Colville vs Immigrants from China Disability
Disability MetricColvilleImmigrants from China
Disability
Tragic
15.8%
Exceptional
10.1%
Males
Tragic
16.5%
Exceptional
9.5%
Females
Tragic
15.1%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
3.3%
Exceptional
0.96%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.9%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
15.8%
Exceptional
8.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
30.5%
Exceptional
20.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
55.4%
Exceptional
46.3%
Vision
Tragic
3.0%
Exceptional
1.8%
Hearing
Tragic
5.3%
Exceptional
2.6%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.3%
Exceptional
16.9%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.2%
Exceptional
5.3%
Self-Care
Tragic
3.1%
Exceptional
2.3%