Chickasaw vs Ethiopian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 99,458,482 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Ethiopians within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.345. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.037% in Ethiopians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to a decrease of 37.3 Ethiopians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($70,005 compared to $89,640, a difference of 28.1%), per capita income ($36,475 compared to $46,569, a difference of 27.7%), and median family income ($85,356 compared to $108,251, a difference of 26.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($47,832 compared to $56,243, a difference of 17.6%), householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $53,818, a difference of 20.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $64,989, a difference of 20.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 46.2%), single father poverty (19.0% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 39.9%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.0% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 36.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 0.070%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 1.7%), and married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 13.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 32.1%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 27.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.30%), unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 69.3%, a difference of 11.3%), in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 7.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 0.22%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 86.2%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 29.8%, a difference of 21.6%), divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 18.2%), and single father households (2.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.19 compared to 3.24, a difference of 1.5%), family households with children (28.2% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 2.1%), and currently married (46.6% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 33.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 28.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 24.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 3.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 53.1%, a difference of 11.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 24.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 59.3%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 57.3%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 55.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.3% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 0.17%), high school diploma (88.4% compared to 89.0%, a difference of 0.60%), and 12th grade, no diploma (90.3% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 0.72%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 67.5%), vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 61.2%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 54.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 3.2%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 9.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 28.2%).