Chickasaw vs Immigrants from North Macedonia Community Comparison

COMPARE

Chickasaw
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from North Macedonia
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Chickasaw

Immigrants from North Macedonia

Fair
Excellent
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,559
SOCIAL INDEX
83.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
64th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from North Macedonia Integration in Chickasaw Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 44,845,970 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from North Macedonia within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.237% in Immigrants from North Macedonia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 236.6 Immigrants from North Macedonia.
Chickasaw Integration in Immigrants from North Macedonia Communities

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from North Macedonia Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from North Macedonia communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $105,892, a difference of 28.8%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $100,101, a difference of 28.4%), and median household income ($70,005 compared to $89,741, a difference of 28.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 4.6%), householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $61,175, a difference of 13.9%), and median female earnings ($34,414 compared to $40,488, a difference of 17.6%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from North Macedonia Income
Income MetricChickasawImmigrants from North Macedonia
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$36,475
Exceptional
$45,622
Median Family Income
Tragic
$85,356
Exceptional
$109,136
Median Household Income
Tragic
$70,005
Exceptional
$89,741
Median Earnings
Tragic
$40,672
Exceptional
$49,658
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$47,832
Exceptional
$59,189
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,414
Excellent
$40,488
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$44,763
Exceptional
$56,503
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$77,929
Exceptional
$100,101
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$82,193
Exceptional
$105,892
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,732
Average
$61,175
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.2%
Tragic
28.4%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from North Macedonia Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from North Macedonia communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.0% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 44.4%), male poverty (13.5% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 42.9%), and single female poverty (26.3% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 41.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 4.5%), single father poverty (19.0% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 5.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 11.4%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from North Macedonia Poverty
Poverty MetricChickasawImmigrants from North Macedonia
Poverty
Tragic
14.7%
Exceptional
10.6%
Families
Tragic
10.8%
Exceptional
7.7%
Males
Tragic
13.5%
Exceptional
9.4%
Females
Tragic
15.9%
Exceptional
11.7%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
24.5%
Exceptional
17.6%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.0%
Exceptional
11.8%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
21.8%
Excellent
16.4%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.5%
Exceptional
14.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.8%
Exceptional
14.9%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.6%
Exceptional
15.2%
Single Males
Tragic
16.3%
Exceptional
12.3%
Single Females
Tragic
26.3%
Exceptional
18.5%
Single Fathers
Tragic
19.0%
Tragic
17.9%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.4%
Exceptional
27.5%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
4.6%
Seniors Over 65 years
Good
10.7%
Exceptional
9.6%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
11.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.1%
Exceptional
10.0%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from North Macedonia Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from North Macedonia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 54.0%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 18.3%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.050%), female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.65%), and unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.83%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from North Macedonia Unemployment
Unemployment MetricChickasawImmigrants from North Macedonia
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Excellent
5.2%
Exceptional
5.1%
Females
Excellent
5.1%
Excellent
5.1%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.7%
Exceptional
16.4%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Exceptional
9.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Fair
6.7%
Exceptional
6.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
4.9%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Good
4.8%
Good
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.3%
Tragic
11.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.0%
Fair
7.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Exceptional
8.5%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.4%
Excellent
5.3%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from North Macedonia Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from North Macedonia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 6.1%), in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 5.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.9% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 4.9%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from North Macedonia Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricChickasawImmigrants from North Macedonia
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
62.3%
Exceptional
65.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
76.2%
Exceptional
80.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.3%
Exceptional
38.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Poor
74.5%
Exceptional
76.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
81.9%
Exceptional
85.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.9%
Exceptional
85.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
80.9%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
79.0%
Exceptional
83.9%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from North Macedonia Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from North Macedonia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 35.2%), births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 28.9%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 26.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.42%), average family size (3.19 compared to 3.16, a difference of 0.74%), and currently married (46.6% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 4.0%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from North Macedonia Family Structure
Family Structure MetricChickasawImmigrants from North Macedonia
Family Households
Good
64.4%
Excellent
64.7%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.2%
Tragic
26.7%
Married-couple Households
Fair
45.9%
Exceptional
47.9%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.19
Tragic
3.16
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.8%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.0%
Exceptional
5.6%
Currently Married
Average
46.6%
Exceptional
48.5%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
14.2%
Exceptional
11.5%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.3%
Exceptional
28.1%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from North Macedonia Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from North Macedonia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 35.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 29.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 89.5%, a difference of 3.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 8.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 20.8%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from North Macedonia Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricChickasawImmigrants from North Macedonia
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.9%
Fair
10.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.3%
Fair
89.5%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.0%
Poor
54.4%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.2%
Tragic
18.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.4%
Tragic
5.7%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from North Macedonia Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from North Macedonia communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.4% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 33.1%), bachelor's degree (30.4% compared to 39.2%, a difference of 28.9%), and professional degree (3.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 24.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (96.4% compared to 96.3%, a difference of 0.10%), 9th grade (95.5% compared to 95.3%, a difference of 0.17%), and 4th grade (98.0% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.33%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from North Macedonia Education Level
Education Level MetricChickasawImmigrants from North Macedonia
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Good
2.0%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.4%
Good
98.0%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.4%
Good
98.0%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Good
98.0%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Good
97.9%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Good
97.8%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Excellent
97.7%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Excellent
97.5%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Excellent
97.2%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Exceptional
96.4%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Exceptional
96.3%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.5%
Exceptional
95.3%
10th Grade
Excellent
94.1%
Exceptional
94.5%
11th Grade
Fair
92.3%
Exceptional
93.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.3%
Exceptional
92.3%
High School Diploma
Poor
88.4%
Exceptional
90.5%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.8%
Exceptional
87.4%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
60.4%
Average
65.4%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.3%
Average
59.5%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.6%
Good
47.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.4%
Excellent
39.2%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.4%
Good
15.2%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.4%
Fair
4.2%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Tragic
1.6%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from North Macedonia Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from North Macedonia communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 56.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 56.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 49.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 11.5%), cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 13.3%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 19.6%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from North Macedonia Disability
Disability MetricChickasawImmigrants from North Macedonia
Disability
Tragic
15.2%
Exceptional
11.4%
Males
Tragic
15.1%
Excellent
10.9%
Females
Tragic
15.2%
Exceptional
11.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.7%
Fair
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.8%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.0%
Exceptional
6.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.1%
Exceptional
10.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
30.2%
Exceptional
21.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
51.2%
Exceptional
45.9%
Vision
Tragic
3.2%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Tragic
4.5%
Poor
3.1%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.5%
Exceptional
16.3%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.0%
Excellent
6.0%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.9%
Exceptional
2.4%