Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Liberia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 70,247,739 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Liberia within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.458. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.620% in Immigrants from Liberia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 619.9 Immigrants from Liberia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Liberia communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 32.2%), median female earnings ($34,414 compared to $37,970, a difference of 10.3%), and householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $47,981, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $53,967, a difference of 0.44%), median male earnings ($47,832 compared to $48,317, a difference of 1.0%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $80,863, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Liberia communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.3% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 28.5%), single father poverty (19.0% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 19.4%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 18.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (10.8% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 0.26%), female poverty (15.9% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 1.2%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.5% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Liberia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 48.2%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 24.7%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 20.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 3.2%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 3.5%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Liberia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 67.6%, a difference of 8.5%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 41.5%, a difference of 8.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 3.5%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 4.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Liberia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 23.6%), married-couple households (45.9% compared to 40.3%, a difference of 13.8%), and divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.2% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 0.020%), average family size (3.19 compared to 3.27, a difference of 2.6%), and births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 37.6%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Liberia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 55.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 38.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 29.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 87.8%, a difference of 5.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 51.3%, a difference of 15.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 29.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Liberia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 45.9%), bachelor's degree (30.4% compared to 33.5%, a difference of 10.3%), and associate's degree (38.6% compared to 42.3%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (90.3% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 0.060%), high school diploma (88.4% compared to 88.2%, a difference of 0.28%), and 11th grade (92.3% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 0.45%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Liberia communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 57.6%), vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 32.6%), and male disability (15.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 26.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 0.86%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 6.5%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 8.8%).