Chickasaw vs Potawatomi Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Potawatomi
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chickasaw
Potawatomi
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,223
SOCIAL INDEX
29.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
227th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Potawatomi Integration in Chickasaw Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 75,279,231 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Potawatomi within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.156. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.019% in Potawatomi. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to a decrease of 19.0 Potawatomi.
Chickasaw vs Potawatomi Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Potawatomi communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $81,774, a difference of 4.9%), per capita income ($36,475 compared to $38,046, a difference of 4.3%), and householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $46,462, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $54,212, a difference of 0.89%), median female earnings ($34,414 compared to $34,739, a difference of 0.95%), and median earnings ($40,672 compared to $41,288, a difference of 1.5%).
Income Metric | Chickasaw | Potawatomi |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,475 | Tragic $38,046 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $85,356 | Tragic $88,265 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,005 | Tragic $72,576 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,672 | Tragic $41,288 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,832 | Tragic $48,768 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,414 | Tragic $34,739 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,763 | Tragic $46,462 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,929 | Tragic $81,774 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,193 | Tragic $84,613 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,732 | Tragic $54,212 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.2% | Tragic 27.7% |
Chickasaw vs Potawatomi Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Potawatomi communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (10.8% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 5.9%), receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 5.0%), and married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (19.0% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 0.32%), single mother poverty (34.4% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 0.87%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 1.2%).
Poverty Metric | Chickasaw | Potawatomi |
Poverty | Tragic 14.7% | Tragic 14.1% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Tragic 10.2% |
Males | Tragic 13.5% | Tragic 12.9% |
Females | Tragic 15.9% | Tragic 15.3% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.5% | Tragic 23.7% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.0% | Tragic 16.5% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.8% | Tragic 21.0% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Tragic 19.0% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.8% | Tragic 19.4% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Tragic 19.2% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.3% | Tragic 15.8% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.3% | Tragic 25.4% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.0% | Tragic 18.9% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.4% | Tragic 34.1% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Poor 5.5% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Good 10.8% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Average 12.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.1% | Poor 12.5% |
Chickasaw vs Potawatomi Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Potawatomi communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 16.2%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 13.9%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.14%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 1.0%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.4%).
Unemployment Metric | Chickasaw | Potawatomi |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Good 5.2% |
Males | Excellent 5.2% | Fair 5.3% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Good 5.2% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Average 11.6% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Excellent 17.2% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Average 10.3% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.7% | Tragic 7.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 6.0% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 4.7% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Average 5.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.4% | Good 5.1% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.3% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 9.6% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Exceptional 8.5% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Tragic 5.7% |
Chickasaw vs Potawatomi Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Potawatomi communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 40.0%, a difference of 4.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.9% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 0.86%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 1.2%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chickasaw | Potawatomi |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.3% | Tragic 62.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.2% | Tragic 77.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.3% | Exceptional 40.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Exceptional 76.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.9% | Tragic 82.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Tragic 82.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.9% | Tragic 82.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.0% | Tragic 80.0% |
Chickasaw vs Potawatomi Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Potawatomi communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 9.2%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 6.7%), and divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 36.2%, a difference of 0.14%), currently married (46.6% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 0.22%), and married-couple households (45.9% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 0.45%).
Family Structure Metric | Chickasaw | Potawatomi |
Family Households | Good 64.4% | Tragic 63.3% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.2% | Tragic 26.9% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 45.9% | Poor 45.7% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Tragic 3.16 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Tragic 2.5% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Poor 6.6% |
Currently Married | Average 46.6% | Average 46.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.2% | Tragic 13.5% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.3% | Tragic 36.2% |
Chickasaw vs Potawatomi Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Potawatomi communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 12.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 2.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 58.0%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 1.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 58.0%, a difference of 1.8%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chickasaw | Potawatomi |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Exceptional 8.8% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Exceptional 91.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.0% | Exceptional 58.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.2% | Exceptional 21.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Chickasaw vs Potawatomi Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Potawatomi communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 5.9%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 5.6%), and bachelor's degree (30.4% compared to 31.9%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (96.4% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 0.030%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.050%), and 7th grade (96.7% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.050%).
Education Level Metric | Chickasaw | Potawatomi |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.3% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.3% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.2% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.1% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 97.9% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 97.8% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Exceptional 96.7% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Exceptional 96.4% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Exceptional 95.5% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Exceptional 94.3% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Good 92.8% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.3% | Fair 91.0% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.4% | Average 89.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.8% | Tragic 84.7% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.4% | Tragic 61.8% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.3% | Tragic 54.6% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Tragic 40.4% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.4% | Tragic 31.9% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Tragic 12.1% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Tragic 3.6% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Tragic 1.6% |
Chickasaw vs Potawatomi Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Potawatomi communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 27.4%), vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 20.0%), and disability age 65 to 74 (30.2% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 2.6%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 4.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 4.6%).
Disability Metric | Chickasaw | Potawatomi |
Disability | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 14.2% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Tragic 14.2% |
Females | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 14.1% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Tragic 1.4% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.8% | Tragic 6.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 8.2% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Tragic 14.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Tragic 27.0% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.2% | Tragic 49.0% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 2.6% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Tragic 4.1% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.5% | Tragic 18.0% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.0% | Tragic 7.3% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Tragic 2.6% |