Chickasaw vs South American Indian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 79,303,606 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of South American Indians within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.962. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.329% in South American Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 329.1 South American Indians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($70,005 compared to $87,446, a difference of 24.9%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $96,497, a difference of 23.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $101,171, a difference of 23.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 9.8%), median male earnings ($47,832 compared to $54,508, a difference of 14.0%), and median earnings ($40,672 compared to $46,952, a difference of 15.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.3% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 34.6%), single female poverty (26.3% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 27.3%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.0% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 25.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 6.9%), married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 8.6%), and receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 10.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 18.4%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 17.4%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 0.42%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 35.8%, a difference of 7.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 6.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 22.3%), divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 20.4%), and births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (45.9% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 0.28%), family households (64.4% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 0.35%), and family households with children (28.2% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 0.91%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 53.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 18.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 88.0%, a difference of 4.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 9.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 16.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 41.5%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 39.1%), and no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 32.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (88.4% compared to 88.5%, a difference of 0.060%), 12th grade, no diploma (90.3% compared to 90.6%, a difference of 0.28%), and 11th grade (92.3% compared to 92.0%, a difference of 0.42%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 56.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 47.7%), and vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 47.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 5.6%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 8.6%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 18.6%).