Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Portugal Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 78,703,933 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Portugal within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.435. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.072% in Immigrants from Portugal. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 71.8 Immigrants from Portugal.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Portugal communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $95,512, a difference of 22.6%), median household income ($70,005 compared to $84,740, a difference of 21.0%), and householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $54,105, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 1.7%), householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $55,924, a difference of 4.1%), and median male earnings ($47,832 compared to $55,182, a difference of 15.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Portugal communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 47.9%), single male poverty (16.3% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 32.2%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 22.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 8.9%), single mother poverty (34.4% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 12.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 13.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Portugal communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 43.0%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 35.3%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 27.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 1.5%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 3.8%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Portugal communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 4.3%), in labor force | age 35-44 (80.9% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 75.8%, a difference of 1.9%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Portugal communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 19.1%), single father households (2.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 4.3%), and currently married (46.6% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.19 compared to 3.18, a difference of 0.18%), births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 36.2%, a difference of 0.36%), and family households (64.4% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Portugal communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 49.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 21.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 88.3%, a difference of 4.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 52.8%, a difference of 11.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 19.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Portugal communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 57.5%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 10.6%), and bachelor's degree (30.4% compared to 32.2%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 0.15%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Portugal communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.5% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 39.3%), vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 37.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 28.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 3.1%), self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 3.7%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 6.5%).