Chickasaw vs Nonimmigrants Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Nonimmigrants
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chickasaw
Nonimmigrants
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,083
SOCIAL INDEX
28.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
234th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Nonimmigrants Integration in Chickasaw Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 11,054,186 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Nonimmigrants within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.586. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.224% in Nonimmigrants. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 224.0 Nonimmigrants.
Chickasaw vs Nonimmigrants Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Nonimmigrants communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $94,448, a difference of 14.9%), median household income ($70,005 compared to $79,429, a difference of 13.5%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $88,301, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 0.090%), householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $57,426, a difference of 6.9%), and median female earnings ($34,414 compared to $37,024, a difference of 7.6%).
Income Metric | Chickasaw | Nonimmigrants |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,475 | Tragic $40,669 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $85,356 | Tragic $96,231 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,005 | Tragic $79,429 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,672 | Tragic $44,117 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,832 | Tragic $52,170 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,414 | Tragic $37,024 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,763 | Tragic $49,348 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,929 | Tragic $88,301 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,193 | Tragic $94,448 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,732 | Tragic $57,426 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.2% | Tragic 27.2% |
Chickasaw vs Nonimmigrants Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Nonimmigrants communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 13.8%), single male poverty (16.3% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 12.0%), and single female poverty (26.3% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (19.0% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 0.57%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 1.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 5.0%).
Poverty Metric | Chickasaw | Nonimmigrants |
Poverty | Tragic 14.7% | Tragic 13.3% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Tragic 9.8% |
Males | Tragic 13.5% | Tragic 12.1% |
Females | Tragic 15.9% | Tragic 14.5% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.5% | Tragic 21.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.0% | Tragic 15.6% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.8% | Tragic 19.7% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Tragic 17.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.8% | Tragic 18.2% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Tragic 18.3% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.3% | Tragic 14.6% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.3% | Tragic 23.6% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.0% | Tragic 18.8% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.4% | Tragic 32.2% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Fair 5.3% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Average 10.9% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Average 12.2% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.1% | Poor 12.4% |
Chickasaw vs Nonimmigrants Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Nonimmigrants communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 33.9%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 16.6%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.94%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 2.4%).
Unemployment Metric | Chickasaw | Nonimmigrants |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Average 5.3% |
Males | Excellent 5.2% | Poor 5.4% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Average 5.3% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 11.9% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Fair 17.9% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Tragic 10.5% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.7% | Tragic 7.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 6.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Good 4.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Poor 4.9% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Average 4.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Fair 5.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.4% | Average 5.1% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.3% | Tragic 9.8% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 8.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Tragic 10.0% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Poor 5.7% |
Chickasaw vs Nonimmigrants Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Nonimmigrants communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 40.1%, a difference of 4.6%), in labor force | age 35-44 (80.9% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 1.9%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 2.3%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chickasaw | Nonimmigrants |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.3% | Tragic 63.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.2% | Tragic 78.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.3% | Exceptional 40.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Exceptional 76.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.9% | Tragic 83.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Tragic 83.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.9% | Tragic 83.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.0% | Tragic 81.2% |
Chickasaw vs Nonimmigrants Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Nonimmigrants communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 12.5%), divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 11.4%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.19 compared to 3.19, a difference of 0.030%), family households (64.4% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 0.58%), and currently married (46.6% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 0.66%).
Family Structure Metric | Chickasaw | Nonimmigrants |
Family Households | Good 64.4% | Exceptional 64.8% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.2% | Good 27.5% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 45.9% | Good 46.9% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Tragic 3.19 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Tragic 2.4% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Poor 6.7% |
Currently Married | Average 46.6% | Good 46.9% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.2% | Tragic 12.8% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.3% | Tragic 35.5% |
Chickasaw vs Nonimmigrants Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Nonimmigrants communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 3.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 2.0%), and no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 0.53%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 0.050%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 58.8%, a difference of 0.40%), and no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 0.53%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chickasaw | Nonimmigrants |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Exceptional 7.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Exceptional 92.2% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.0% | Exceptional 58.8% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.2% | Exceptional 21.8% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Exceptional 7.2% |
Chickasaw vs Nonimmigrants Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Nonimmigrants communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.4% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 16.7%), professional degree (3.4% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 16.0%), and bachelor's degree (30.4% compared to 34.2%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (94.1% compared to 94.1%, a difference of 0.020%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.11%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.11%).
Education Level Metric | Chickasaw | Nonimmigrants |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Exceptional 1.8% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.3% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.3% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.2% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.2% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.1% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 97.9% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 97.7% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Exceptional 97.4% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Exceptional 96.5% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Exceptional 96.2% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Exceptional 95.3% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Excellent 94.1% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Good 92.7% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.3% | Fair 91.0% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.4% | Average 89.2% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.8% | Fair 85.2% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.4% | Tragic 62.9% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.3% | Tragic 56.5% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Tragic 42.9% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.4% | Tragic 34.2% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Tragic 13.3% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Tragic 3.9% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Tragic 1.7% |
Chickasaw vs Nonimmigrants Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Nonimmigrants communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 28.2%), hearing disability (4.5% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 25.0%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 23.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 6.3%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 6.6%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 8.2%).
Disability Metric | Chickasaw | Nonimmigrants |
Disability | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 13.2% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Tragic 12.9% |
Females | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 13.4% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Tragic 1.6% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.8% | Tragic 6.3% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 7.6% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Tragic 13.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Tragic 25.0% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.2% | Tragic 48.0% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 2.5% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Tragic 3.6% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.5% | Fair 17.4% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.0% | Tragic 6.9% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Tragic 2.6% |