Chickasaw vs Tlingit-Haida Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Tlingit-Haida
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chickasaw
Tlingit-Haida
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
5,201
SOCIAL INDEX
49.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
182nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Tlingit-Haida Integration in Chickasaw Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 40,854,146 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Tlingit-Haida within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.070. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.003% in Tlingit-Haida. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 3.2 Tlingit-Haida.
Chickasaw vs Tlingit-Haida Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Tlingit-Haida communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $55,914, a difference of 24.9%), median household income ($70,005 compared to $83,968, a difference of 19.9%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $92,987, a difference of 19.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($47,832 compared to $52,409, a difference of 9.6%), median earnings ($40,672 compared to $45,468, a difference of 11.8%), and wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 13.4%).
Income Metric | Chickasaw | Tlingit-Haida |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,475 | Average $43,516 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $85,356 | Fair $101,092 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,005 | Fair $83,968 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,672 | Fair $45,468 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,832 | Poor $52,409 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,414 | Average $39,513 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,763 | Exceptional $55,914 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,929 | Fair $92,987 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,193 | Poor $97,417 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,732 | Excellent $62,922 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.2% | Exceptional 24.0% |
Chickasaw vs Tlingit-Haida Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Tlingit-Haida communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.3% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 40.7%), child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 36.9%), and family poverty (10.8% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 35.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 11.2%), single mother poverty (34.4% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 11.3%), and receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 13.0%).
Poverty Metric | Chickasaw | Tlingit-Haida |
Poverty | Tragic 14.7% | Excellent 11.7% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Exceptional 8.0% |
Males | Tragic 13.5% | Good 10.9% |
Females | Tragic 15.9% | Exceptional 12.5% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.5% | Tragic 22.0% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.0% | Fair 13.8% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.8% | Exceptional 15.9% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Exceptional 14.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.8% | Exceptional 15.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Exceptional 14.7% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.3% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.3% | Tragic 21.9% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.0% | Exceptional 15.3% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.4% | Tragic 30.9% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Exceptional 8.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Exceptional 9.7% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.1% | Average 11.6% |
Chickasaw vs Tlingit-Haida Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Tlingit-Haida communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 182.3%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 54.0%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 47.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.52%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 0.83%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 2.8%).
Unemployment Metric | Chickasaw | Tlingit-Haida |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 5.6% |
Males | Excellent 5.2% | Tragic 6.0% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 12.7% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Tragic 23.5% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Fair 10.3% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.7% | Tragic 8.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 6.0% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 4.7% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Tragic 5.7% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 6.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 6.5% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 6.8% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.3% | Tragic 20.7% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 8.9% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Exceptional 7.1% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Good 5.4% |
Chickasaw vs Tlingit-Haida Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Tlingit-Haida communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 6.2%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 40.5%, a difference of 5.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 0.49%), in labor force | age 35-44 (80.9% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 3.1%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chickasaw | Tlingit-Haida |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.3% | Excellent 65.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.2% | Tragic 79.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.3% | Exceptional 40.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Exceptional 77.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.9% | Poor 84.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Tragic 82.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.9% | Tragic 82.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.0% | Exceptional 83.9% |
Chickasaw vs Tlingit-Haida Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Tlingit-Haida communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 22.6%), births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 32.2%, a difference of 12.7%), and family households with children (28.2% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.6% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 0.12%), average family size (3.19 compared to 3.16, a difference of 1.0%), and married-couple households (45.9% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 1.7%).
Family Structure Metric | Chickasaw | Tlingit-Haida |
Family Households | Good 64.4% | Tragic 61.6% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.2% | Tragic 26.0% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 45.9% | Tragic 45.1% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Tragic 3.16 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Tragic 2.7% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Exceptional 5.7% |
Currently Married | Average 46.6% | Average 46.7% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.2% | Tragic 13.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.3% | Fair 32.2% |
Chickasaw vs Tlingit-Haida Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Tlingit-Haida communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 28.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 11.7%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 2.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 55.8%, a difference of 5.8%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 8.7%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chickasaw | Tlingit-Haida |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Good 10.1% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Good 90.1% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.0% | Good 55.8% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.2% | Good 19.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Chickasaw vs Tlingit-Haida Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Tlingit-Haida communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 18.7%), no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 16.7%), and bachelor's degree (30.4% compared to 34.6%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.33%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.34%), and 2nd grade (98.3% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.34%).
Education Level Metric | Chickasaw | Tlingit-Haida |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Exceptional 1.5% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.7% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.7% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.7% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.6% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.5% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 98.4% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 98.3% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Exceptional 98.1% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Exceptional 97.5% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Exceptional 97.3% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Exceptional 96.6% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Exceptional 95.7% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Exceptional 94.4% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.3% | Exceptional 93.0% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.4% | Exceptional 91.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.8% | Exceptional 87.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.4% | Good 65.9% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.3% | Average 59.4% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Tragic 43.0% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.4% | Tragic 34.6% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Tragic 12.8% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Tragic 4.0% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Poor 1.7% |
Chickasaw vs Tlingit-Haida Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Tlingit-Haida communities in the United States are seen in ambulatory disability (8.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 24.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 22.2%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 50.6%, a difference of 1.2%), cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 7.3%), and hearing disability (4.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 8.2%).
Disability Metric | Chickasaw | Tlingit-Haida |
Disability | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 13.5% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Tragic 13.8% |
Females | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 13.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Tragic 1.5% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.8% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 7.7% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Tragic 13.2% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Tragic 27.1% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.2% | Tragic 50.6% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 2.9% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Tragic 4.8% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.5% | Average 17.2% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.0% | Tragic 6.5% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Good 2.4% |