Chickasaw vs Irish Community Comparison

COMPARE

Chickasaw
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Irish
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Chickasaw

Irish

Fair
Good
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,960
SOCIAL INDEX
67.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
134th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Irish Integration in Chickasaw Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,722,629 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Irish within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.427. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.300% in Irish. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 300.0 Irish.
Chickasaw Integration in Irish Communities

Chickasaw vs Irish Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Irish communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $103,067, a difference of 25.4%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $96,730, a difference of 24.1%), and median family income ($85,356 compared to $105,453, a difference of 23.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 4.8%), householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $61,097, a difference of 13.7%), and median female earnings ($34,414 compared to $39,291, a difference of 14.2%).
Chickasaw vs Irish Income
Income MetricChickasawIrish
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$36,475
Good
$44,679
Median Family Income
Tragic
$85,356
Excellent
$105,453
Median Household Income
Tragic
$70,005
Good
$86,145
Median Earnings
Tragic
$40,672
Good
$47,276
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$47,832
Excellent
$56,464
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,414
Fair
$39,291
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$44,763
Poor
$51,317
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$77,929
Good
$96,730
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$82,193
Good
$103,067
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,732
Average
$61,097
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.2%
Tragic
28.5%

Chickasaw vs Irish Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Irish communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 38.2%), family poverty (10.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 37.5%), and male poverty (13.5% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 31.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (19.0% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 5.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 8.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 15.1%).
Chickasaw vs Irish Poverty
Poverty MetricChickasawIrish
Poverty
Tragic
14.7%
Exceptional
11.3%
Families
Tragic
10.8%
Exceptional
7.9%
Males
Tragic
13.5%
Exceptional
10.3%
Females
Tragic
15.9%
Exceptional
12.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
24.5%
Average
20.1%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.0%
Fair
13.7%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
21.8%
Good
16.8%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.5%
Exceptional
14.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.8%
Exceptional
15.2%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.6%
Exceptional
15.3%
Single Males
Tragic
16.3%
Tragic
14.0%
Single Females
Tragic
26.3%
Fair
21.4%
Single Fathers
Tragic
19.0%
Tragic
18.0%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.4%
Poor
29.8%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
4.2%
Seniors Over 65 years
Good
10.7%
Exceptional
9.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
10.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.1%
Exceptional
10.2%

Chickasaw vs Irish Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Irish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 39.3%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 14.8%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 0.0%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 0.29%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 0.79%).
Chickasaw vs Irish Unemployment
Unemployment MetricChickasawIrish
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.8%
Males
Excellent
5.2%
Exceptional
5.0%
Females
Excellent
5.1%
Exceptional
4.7%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
11.1%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.7%
Exceptional
16.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Fair
6.7%
Fair
6.7%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.2%
Fair
5.5%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
4.9%
Excellent
4.5%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Good
4.8%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Good
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.4%
Excellent
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.3%
Tragic
10.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.0%
Tragic
8.1%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Tragic
9.5%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.4%
Exceptional
5.1%

Chickasaw vs Irish Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Irish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 9.5%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.9% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 2.9%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 3.8%).
Chickasaw vs Irish Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricChickasawIrish
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
62.3%
Tragic
64.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
76.2%
Poor
79.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.3%
Exceptional
42.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Poor
74.5%
Exceptional
77.4%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
81.9%
Exceptional
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.9%
Average
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
80.9%
Average
84.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
79.0%
Fair
82.6%

Chickasaw vs Irish Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Irish communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 21.3%), single father households (2.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 19.8%), and divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 0.050%), average family size (3.19 compared to 3.10, a difference of 2.8%), and currently married (46.6% compared to 48.9%, a difference of 4.9%).
Chickasaw vs Irish Family Structure
Family Structure MetricChickasawIrish
Family Households
Good
64.4%
Average
64.4%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.2%
Tragic
26.8%
Married-couple Households
Fair
45.9%
Exceptional
48.6%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.19
Tragic
3.10
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.8%
Good
2.3%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.0%
Exceptional
5.8%
Currently Married
Average
46.6%
Exceptional
48.9%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
14.2%
Tragic
12.5%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.3%
Fair
32.2%

Chickasaw vs Irish Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Irish communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 5.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 5.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 93.1%, a difference of 0.85%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 1.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 2.1%).
Chickasaw vs Irish Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricChickasawIrish
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.9%
Exceptional
7.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.3%
Exceptional
93.1%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.0%
Exceptional
60.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.2%
Exceptional
21.8%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.4%
Exceptional
7.1%

Chickasaw vs Irish Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Irish communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.4% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 31.7%), professional degree (3.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 31.1%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 25.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.25%), 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.25%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.26%).
Chickasaw vs Irish Education Level
Education Level MetricChickasawIrish
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Exceptional
1.4%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.6%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.6%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.6%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.6%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.5%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
98.4%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
98.3%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Exceptional
98.1%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Exceptional
97.5%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Exceptional
97.3%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.5%
Exceptional
96.5%
10th Grade
Excellent
94.1%
Exceptional
95.6%
11th Grade
Fair
92.3%
Exceptional
94.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.3%
Exceptional
93.0%
High School Diploma
Poor
88.4%
Exceptional
91.4%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.8%
Exceptional
87.6%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
60.4%
Good
66.0%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.3%
Average
59.6%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.6%
Average
46.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.4%
Average
37.6%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.4%
Average
15.0%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.4%
Average
4.4%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Good
1.9%

Chickasaw vs Irish Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Irish communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 39.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 30.8%), and disability age 65 to 74 (30.2% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 29.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 2.6%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 10.0%), and disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 10.1%).
Chickasaw vs Irish Disability
Disability MetricChickasawIrish
Disability
Tragic
15.2%
Tragic
12.9%
Males
Tragic
15.1%
Tragic
12.7%
Females
Tragic
15.2%
Tragic
13.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.7%
Tragic
1.7%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.8%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.0%
Tragic
7.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.1%
Tragic
12.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
30.2%
Average
23.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
51.2%
Exceptional
46.5%
Vision
Tragic
3.2%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Tragic
4.5%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.5%
Exceptional
16.8%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.0%
Tragic
6.6%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.9%
Fair
2.5%