Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Africa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 139,537,698 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Africa within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.392. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.033% in Immigrants from Africa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to a decrease of 32.9 Immigrants from Africa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($70,005 compared to $83,289, a difference of 19.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $97,284, a difference of 18.4%), and per capita income ($36,475 compared to $42,950, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $59,837, a difference of 11.4%), median male earnings ($47,832 compared to $53,457, a difference of 11.8%), and householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $50,609, a difference of 13.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.3% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 28.4%), single female poverty (26.3% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 22.0%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.0% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 21.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 2.6%), married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 6.2%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (19.6% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 8.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 22.6%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 17.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.040%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.68%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 0.84%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 67.4%, a difference of 8.1%), in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 5.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 0.73%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 75.8%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 17.0%), single father households (2.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 15.9%), and births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 33.0%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.2% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 0.92%), average family size (3.19 compared to 3.25, a difference of 1.8%), and family households (64.4% compared to 62.4%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 59.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 33.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 26.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 87.6%, a difference of 5.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 51.8%, a difference of 13.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 26.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 41.9%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 37.6%), and professional degree (3.4% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 35.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (88.4% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 0.010%), 12th grade, no diploma (90.3% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 0.19%), and 11th grade (92.3% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 0.47%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 64.4%), vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 48.0%), and disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 42.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 1.9%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 8.2%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 19.0%).