Chickasaw vs Dutch West Indian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,936,741 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Dutch West Indians within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.224. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.042% in Dutch West Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 42.2 Dutch West Indians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Dutch West Indian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $50,475, a difference of 6.5%), median family income ($85,356 compared to $81,852, a difference of 4.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $79,171, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $77,260, a difference of 0.87%), median female earnings ($34,414 compared to $34,106, a difference of 0.90%), and median earnings ($40,672 compared to $40,107, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Dutch West Indian communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 16.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 15.6%), and married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 0.10%), single male poverty (16.3% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and single father poverty (19.0% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Dutch West Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 38.3%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.3% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 32.6%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 21.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 5.7%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 6.1%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 8.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Dutch West Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 7.7%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 1.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (80.9% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 0.62%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 81.1%, a difference of 0.91%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 0.95%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Dutch West Indian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 38.4%, a difference of 5.8%), single father households (2.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 4.3%), and family households with children (28.2% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 0.10%), average family size (3.19 compared to 3.23, a difference of 1.4%), and divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Dutch West Indian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 42.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 6.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 89.0%, a difference of 3.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 4.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 6.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Dutch West Indian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 21.7%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 13.4%), and professional degree (3.4% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.35%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.36%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.37%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Dutch West Indian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 11.2%), disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 6.4%), and hearing disability (4.5% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 0.66%), vision disability (3.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 0.91%), and female disability (15.2% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 1.4%).