Chickasaw vs Menominee Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 32,666,423 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Menominee within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.084. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.022% in Menominee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to a decrease of 21.7 Menominee.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 19.6%), median male earnings ($47,832 compared to $42,581, a difference of 12.3%), and median earnings ($40,672 compared to $37,884, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($34,414 compared to $33,894, a difference of 1.5%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $79,358, a difference of 1.8%), and median household income ($70,005 compared to $68,423, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 31.3%), child poverty among girls under 16 (19.6% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 27.5%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.5% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.0% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 5.6%), single female poverty (26.3% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 6.0%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 120.1%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 67.2%), and female unemployment (5.1% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 37.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.7% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 0.71%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 2.3%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 13.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 68.7%, a difference of 8.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 0.34%), in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.9% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 53.2%), births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 51.1%, a difference of 40.8%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 30.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.2% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 2.1%), family households (64.4% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 3.3%), and average family size (3.19 compared to 3.30, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 49.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 49.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 29.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 88.3%, a difference of 4.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 55.3%, a difference of 6.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 29.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 14.5%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 12.1%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (96.4% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 0.010%), 7th grade (96.7% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.080%), and 9th grade (95.5% compared to 95.6%, a difference of 0.12%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 32.0%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 29.0%), and vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 25.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 0.51%), male disability (15.1% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 0.91%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 1.4%).