Chickasaw vs Polish Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 146,703,269 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Poles within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.321. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.042% in Poles. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to a decrease of 41.6 Poles.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Polish communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $105,952, a difference of 28.9%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $99,685, a difference of 27.9%), and median family income ($85,356 compared to $108,507, a difference of 27.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 5.1%), householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $61,598, a difference of 14.6%), and householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $52,407, a difference of 17.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Polish communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (10.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 45.9%), married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 43.9%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 39.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (19.0% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 9.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 9.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 17.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Polish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 40.4%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 16.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 0.050%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.57%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Polish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 42.1%, a difference of 9.9%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 5.7%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.9% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 3.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 77.6%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Polish communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 26.4%), single father households (2.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 25.4%), and divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 19.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 0.65%), average family size (3.19 compared to 3.09, a difference of 3.1%), and currently married (46.6% compared to 48.9%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Polish communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 16.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 9.9%), and no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 91.7%, a difference of 0.64%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 58.3%, a difference of 1.2%), and no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 7.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Polish communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.4% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 37.9%), professional degree (3.4% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 35.7%), and bachelor's degree (30.4% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 28.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.24%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.24%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.24%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Polish communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 52.6%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 42.0%), and disability age 65 to 74 (30.2% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 37.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 9.4%), cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 12.9%), and disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 45.3%, a difference of 12.9%).