Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Southern Europe Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 127,179,844 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Southern Europe within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.547. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.037% in Immigrants from Southern Europe. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 36.7 Immigrants from Southern Europe.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Southern Europe communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $103,486, a difference of 32.8%), per capita income ($36,475 compared to $48,027, a difference of 31.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $107,775, a difference of 31.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 2.8%), householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $61,902, a difference of 15.2%), and householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $54,484, a difference of 21.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Southern Europe communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 35.2%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 34.7%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.0% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 33.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 4.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 9.2%), and single father poverty (19.0% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 13.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Southern Europe communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 24.7%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 23.0%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 19.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 0.32%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 1.9%), and female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Southern Europe communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 36.4%, a difference of 5.2%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.9% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 0.11%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Southern Europe communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 27.6%), divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 22.9%), and births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 0.020%), average family size (3.19 compared to 3.18, a difference of 0.36%), and currently married (46.6% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 0.68%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Southern Europe communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 65.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 29.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 23.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 87.1%, a difference of 6.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 52.3%, a difference of 12.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 23.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Southern Europe communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 49.8%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 45.5%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 34.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.3% compared to 92.1%, a difference of 0.29%), high school diploma (88.4% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 0.36%), and 12th grade, no diploma (90.3% compared to 90.8%, a difference of 0.50%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Southern Europe communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 50.1%), vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 49.3%), and hearing disability (4.5% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 47.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 10.5%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 10.8%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 13.6%).