Chickasaw vs Bermudan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 37,298,252 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Bermudans within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.730. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.171% in Bermudans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 170.8 Bermudans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Bermudan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,475 compared to $42,911, a difference of 17.6%), wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 17.5%), and median household income ($70,005 compared to $80,406, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $47,359, a difference of 5.8%), householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $58,171, a difference of 8.3%), and median male earnings ($47,832 compared to $52,465, a difference of 9.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Bermudan communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.0% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 25.4%), single male poverty (16.3% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 24.4%), and single female poverty (26.3% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 0.99%), child poverty among girls under 16 (19.6% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 8.2%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.5% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 8.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Bermudan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 33.6%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 33.1%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 25.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.67%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Bermudan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 6.0%), in labor force | age 35-44 (80.9% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 5.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 0.46%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Bermudan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 29.3%), divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 12.1%), and married-couple households (45.9% compared to 42.4%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.19 compared to 3.20, a difference of 0.30%), births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 35.5%, a difference of 2.1%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Bermudan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 62.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 32.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 25.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 87.5%, a difference of 5.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 50.6%, a difference of 16.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 25.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Bermudan communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.4% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 35.0%), professional degree (3.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 29.8%), and no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 26.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (94.1% compared to 93.9%, a difference of 0.15%), 11th grade (92.3% compared to 92.6%, a difference of 0.32%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.40%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Bermudan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 55.4%), vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 41.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 35.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 2.0%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 7.6%), and disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 9.2%).