Chickasaw vs Osage Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 65,218,951 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Osage within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.147. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.013% in Osage. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to a decrease of 12.8 Osage.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Osage communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,475 compared to $39,568, a difference of 8.5%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $84,461, a difference of 8.4%), and median family income ($85,356 compared to $91,926, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 0.36%), householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $45,764, a difference of 2.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $55,677, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Osage communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among boys under 16 (19.8% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 11.8%), receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 11.5%), and family poverty (10.8% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 0.090%), single father poverty (19.0% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 0.40%), and single male poverty (16.3% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 0.91%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Osage communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 23.9%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 20.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.0%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.11%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.76%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Osage communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 35-44 (80.9% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.5%), in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 78.0%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 0.41%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 0.51%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Osage communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 32.1%, a difference of 13.2%), single father households (2.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 11.2%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.19 compared to 3.18, a difference of 0.31%), family households (64.4% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 1.0%), and currently married (46.6% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Osage communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 10.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 4.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 58.8%, a difference of 0.36%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 0.95%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Osage communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 10.1%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 10.0%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.5% compared to 95.5%, a difference of 0.0%), 4th grade (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.030%), and 8th grade (96.4% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 0.030%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Osage communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 18.5%), self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 11.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 2.8%), cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 4.2%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 4.9%).