Native Hawaiian vs Immigrants from China Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 303,700,420 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China within Native Hawaiian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.341. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Native Hawaiians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.021% in Immigrants from China. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Native Hawaiians corresponds to a decrease of 21.1 Immigrants from China.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($41,017 compared to $54,264, a difference of 32.3%), median male earnings ($52,306 compared to $67,353, a difference of 28.8%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,058 compared to $119,756, a difference of 26.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($71,021 compared to $69,174, a difference of 2.7%), wage/income gap (25.4% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 4.9%), and householder income under 25 years ($55,158 compared to $57,931, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.8% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 34.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.1% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 31.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.4% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 22.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (10.7% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 0.030%), female poverty (12.5% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 0.31%), and poverty (11.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.46%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 31.0%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 21.7%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.96%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 2.2%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.6% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.4% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 20.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 8.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.0% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.73%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.97%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (34.3% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 39.0%), single father households (2.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 35.2%), and single mother households (6.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 21.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.9% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 0.060%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.11%), and married-couple households (49.1% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 97.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 55.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.9% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 36.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 8.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.4% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 19.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.9% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 36.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 95.3%), professional degree (3.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 76.9%), and master's degree (12.3% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 72.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (87.5% compared to 86.9%, a difference of 0.67%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 40.5%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 39.8%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.7% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 34.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 1.3%), disability age over 75 (48.3% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 4.4%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 9.5%).