Chickasaw vs Marshallese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 11,062,608 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Marshallese within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.073. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.020% in Marshallese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 20.3 Marshallese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Marshallese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $65,874, a difference of 22.6%), wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 15.9%), and householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $50,627, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($47,832 compared to $48,137, a difference of 0.64%), median earnings ($40,672 compared to $41,969, a difference of 3.2%), and median female earnings ($34,414 compared to $36,459, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Marshallese communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 17.0%), single female poverty (26.3% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 12.8%), and single father poverty (19.0% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (16.3% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 0.78%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 4.8%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (19.6% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Marshallese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 21.0%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 20.0%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 19.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 3.5%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 3.9%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Marshallese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 4.0%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 1.7%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.9% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Marshallese communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 18.4%), single father households (2.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 13.1%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 1.0%), currently married (46.6% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 2.3%), and married-couple households (45.9% compared to 44.6%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Marshallese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 25.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 9.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 54.9%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 2.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 4.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 54.9%, a difference of 7.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Marshallese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 16.7%), professional degree (3.4% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 11.6%), and associate's degree (38.6% compared to 41.6%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.3% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.060%), high school diploma (88.4% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 0.25%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.30%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Marshallese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 0.94%, a difference of 85.8%), vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 37.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 28.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 50.1%, a difference of 2.2%), cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 4.4%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 10.1%).