Chickasaw vs Sierra Leonean Community Comparison

COMPARE

Chickasaw
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsagePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Sierra Leonean
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Chickasaw

Sierra Leoneans

Fair
Average
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
4,851
SOCIAL INDEX
46.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
191st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Sierra Leonean Integration in Chickasaw Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 54,238,539 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Sierra Leoneans within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.242. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.051% in Sierra Leoneans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to a decrease of 50.9 Sierra Leoneans.
Chickasaw Integration in Sierra Leonean Communities

Chickasaw vs Sierra Leonean Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Sierra Leonean communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $57,272, a difference of 28.0%), wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 26.7%), and median household income ($70,005 compared to $88,463, a difference of 26.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($47,832 compared to $54,279, a difference of 13.5%), median earnings ($40,672 compared to $48,286, a difference of 18.7%), and per capita income ($36,475 compared to $43,405, a difference of 19.0%).
Chickasaw vs Sierra Leonean Income
Income MetricChickasawSierra Leonean
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$36,475
Average
$43,405
Median Family Income
Tragic
$85,356
Good
$103,859
Median Household Income
Tragic
$70,005
Excellent
$88,463
Median Earnings
Tragic
$40,672
Exceptional
$48,286
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$47,832
Average
$54,279
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,414
Exceptional
$42,868
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$44,763
Exceptional
$57,272
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$77,929
Fair
$93,435
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$82,193
Good
$102,427
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,732
Exceptional
$65,038
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.2%
Exceptional
21.4%

Chickasaw vs Sierra Leonean Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Sierra Leonean communities in the United States are seen in single female poverty (26.3% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 33.0%), single male poverty (16.3% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 29.2%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.0% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 28.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 2.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 2.2%), and receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 7.1%).
Chickasaw vs Sierra Leonean Poverty
Poverty MetricChickasawSierra Leonean
Poverty
Tragic
14.7%
Fair
12.6%
Families
Tragic
10.8%
Poor
9.5%
Males
Tragic
13.5%
Fair
11.4%
Females
Tragic
15.9%
Fair
13.7%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
24.5%
Exceptional
19.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.0%
Good
13.2%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
21.8%
Fair
17.7%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.5%
Tragic
17.6%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.8%
Tragic
17.8%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.6%
Tragic
17.6%
Single Males
Tragic
16.3%
Good
12.6%
Single Females
Tragic
26.3%
Exceptional
19.7%
Single Fathers
Tragic
19.0%
Tragic
17.2%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.4%
Exceptional
27.4%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.8%
Good
5.1%
Seniors Over 65 years
Good
10.7%
Excellent
10.5%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
11.4%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.1%
Fair
12.2%

Chickasaw vs Sierra Leonean Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Sierra Leonean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 24.7%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 21.9%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 19.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.31%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 6.7%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 6.9%).
Chickasaw vs Sierra Leonean Unemployment
Unemployment MetricChickasawSierra Leonean
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
5.8%
Males
Excellent
5.2%
Tragic
6.2%
Females
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
5.5%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
13.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.7%
Tragic
19.7%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Tragic
11.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Fair
6.7%
Tragic
7.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.2%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
4.9%
Tragic
4.9%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Average
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Good
4.8%
Tragic
5.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
5.4%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.3%
Tragic
9.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.0%
Average
7.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Tragic
9.9%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.4%
Tragic
5.8%

Chickasaw vs Sierra Leonean Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Sierra Leonean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 68.9%, a difference of 10.6%), in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 7.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 37.6%, a difference of 2.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 76.3%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 4.7%).
Chickasaw vs Sierra Leonean Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricChickasawSierra Leonean
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
62.3%
Exceptional
68.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
76.2%
Exceptional
81.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.3%
Excellent
37.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Poor
74.5%
Exceptional
76.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
81.9%
Exceptional
85.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.9%
Exceptional
86.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
80.9%
Exceptional
86.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
79.0%
Exceptional
84.5%

Chickasaw vs Sierra Leonean Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Sierra Leonean communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 17.2%), single father households (2.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 12.0%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 0.86%), family households with children (28.2% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 2.2%), and average family size (3.19 compared to 3.30, a difference of 3.4%).
Chickasaw vs Sierra Leonean Family Structure
Family Structure MetricChickasawSierra Leonean
Family Households
Good
64.4%
Poor
63.9%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.2%
Exceptional
28.9%
Married-couple Households
Fair
45.9%
Tragic
42.9%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.19
Exceptional
3.30
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.8%
Tragic
2.5%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.0%
Tragic
7.7%
Currently Married
Average
46.6%
Tragic
43.4%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
14.2%
Fair
12.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.3%
Tragic
34.9%

Chickasaw vs Sierra Leonean Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Sierra Leonean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 40.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 26.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 21.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 89.0%, a difference of 3.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 52.9%, a difference of 11.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 21.2%).
Chickasaw vs Sierra Leonean Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricChickasawSierra Leonean
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.9%
Poor
11.0%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.3%
Poor
89.0%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.0%
Tragic
52.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.2%
Tragic
18.3%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.4%
Tragic
5.9%

Chickasaw vs Sierra Leonean Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Sierra Leonean communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.4% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 46.9%), no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 36.5%), and professional degree (3.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 33.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.3% compared to 92.6%, a difference of 0.28%), 10th grade (94.1% compared to 93.7%, a difference of 0.38%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.68%).
Chickasaw vs Sierra Leonean Education Level
Education Level MetricChickasawSierra Leonean
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Tragic
2.3%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.7%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.7%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.7%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.6%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.5%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
97.3%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Tragic
97.1%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Tragic
96.8%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Fair
96.0%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Fair
95.6%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.5%
Average
94.8%
10th Grade
Excellent
94.1%
Average
93.7%
11th Grade
Fair
92.3%
Average
92.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.3%
Average
91.1%
High School Diploma
Poor
88.4%
Average
89.1%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.8%
Good
86.0%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
60.4%
Good
66.0%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.3%
Good
60.2%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.6%
Excellent
47.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.4%
Exceptional
40.1%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.4%
Exceptional
16.8%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.4%
Good
4.5%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Excellent
2.0%

Chickasaw vs Sierra Leonean Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Sierra Leonean communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 79.0%), vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 50.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 49.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 3.1%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 7.9%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 18.4%).
Chickasaw vs Sierra Leonean Disability
Disability MetricChickasawSierra Leonean
Disability
Tragic
15.2%
Exceptional
11.0%
Males
Tragic
15.1%
Exceptional
10.5%
Females
Tragic
15.2%
Exceptional
11.5%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.7%
Average
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.8%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.0%
Poor
6.8%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.1%
Excellent
10.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
30.2%
Good
23.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
51.2%
Average
47.4%
Vision
Tragic
3.2%
Excellent
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
4.5%
Exceptional
2.5%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.5%
Tragic
17.9%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.0%
Exceptional
5.7%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.9%
Exceptional
2.4%