Chickasaw vs Ute Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 40,610,237 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Ute within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.167. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.012% in Ute. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to a decrease of 12.4 Ute.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Ute communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $49,997, a difference of 11.7%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $82,166, a difference of 5.4%), and median household income ($70,005 compared to $72,402, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($36,475 compared to $36,651, a difference of 0.48%), median earnings ($40,672 compared to $41,051, a difference of 0.93%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $52,949, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Ute communities in the United States are seen in male poverty (13.5% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 20.4%), poverty (14.7% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 15.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (19.0% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 2.4%), single mother poverty (34.4% compared to 35.7%, a difference of 3.7%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Ute communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 45.8%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 43.7%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 38.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 1.5%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 7.9%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 8.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Ute communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 78.9%, a difference of 3.8%), in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 37.1%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 0.90%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 80.8%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.9% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Ute communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 12.4%), births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 33.0%, a difference of 10.0%), and average family size (3.19 compared to 3.49, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 0.090%), family households with children (28.2% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 0.25%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 0.86%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Ute communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 47.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 17.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 2.1%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 4.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Ute communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 33.5%), no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 33.4%), and professional degree (3.4% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 19.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of associate's degree (38.6% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 0.040%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.17%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.17%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Ute communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 0.86%, a difference of 102.1%), ambulatory disability (8.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 34.6%), and vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 32.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 2.7%), cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 7.0%), and disability age 65 to 74 (30.2% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 10.6%).