Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Guatemala Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 127,240,647 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Guatemala within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.071. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.012% in Immigrants from Guatemala. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to a decrease of 12.2 Immigrants from Guatemala.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 21.0%), householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $51,447, a difference of 14.9%), and median household income ($70,005 compared to $75,123, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $53,950, a difference of 0.41%), median earnings ($40,672 compared to $40,851, a difference of 0.44%), and median family income ($85,356 compared to $87,191, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 29.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 29.3%), and married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 24.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 1.0%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.0% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 2.3%), and single mother poverty (34.4% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 27.6%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 24.7%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 21.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 3.1%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 3.7%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 8.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 5.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 16.6%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 9.8%), and currently married (46.6% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 1.0%), family households with children (28.2% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 2.1%), and births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 42.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 12.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 53.5%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 3.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 8.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 53.5%, a difference of 10.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 111.1%), high school diploma (88.4% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 8.7%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of bachelor's degree (30.4% compared to 30.8%, a difference of 1.2%), associate's degree (38.6% compared to 38.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 60.6%), disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 42.5%), and disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 42.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 49.1%, a difference of 4.2%), cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 4.2%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 10.9%).