Chickasaw vs West Indian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 98,349,472 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of West Indians within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.503. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.509% in West Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 509.2 West Indians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and West Indian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 38.8%), median female earnings ($34,414 compared to $40,317, a difference of 17.2%), and householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $51,583, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $54,936, a difference of 2.2%), median male earnings ($47,832 compared to $50,682, a difference of 6.0%), and median family income ($85,356 compared to $92,765, a difference of 8.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and West Indian communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 34.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 32.0%), and receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 24.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty (15.9% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 1.6%), male poverty (13.5% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 2.0%), and poverty (14.7% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and West Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.7% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 34.5%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 30.7%), and male unemployment (5.2% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 28.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 4.8%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 6.8%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 9.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and West Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 31.3%, a difference of 22.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 71.3%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.9% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 2.0%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 78.3%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and West Indian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 24.0%), divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 14.8%), and married-couple households (45.9% compared to 40.3%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 2.1%), births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 37.3%, a difference of 2.7%), and average family size (3.19 compared to 3.29, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and West Indian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 201.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 76.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 61.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 76.4%, a difference of 20.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 41.3%, a difference of 42.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 61.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and West Indian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 46.3%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 26.6%), and professional degree (3.4% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.86%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.89%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.89%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and West Indian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 69.9%), disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 53.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 42.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 2.3%), self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 3.6%), and disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 48.6%, a difference of 5.3%).