Chickasaw vs Guatemalan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 132,705,432 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Guatemalans within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.300. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.047% in Guatemalans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to a decrease of 47.4 Guatemalans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 20.1%), householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $51,525, a difference of 15.1%), and median household income ($70,005 compared to $75,961, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($40,672 compared to $41,205, a difference of 1.3%), householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $54,526, a difference of 1.5%), and median male earnings ($47,832 compared to $46,736, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 27.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 26.6%), and married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 21.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 0.82%), male poverty (13.5% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 2.4%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.0% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 26.7%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 23.9%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 3.5%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 3.6%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 35.5%, a difference of 8.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 5.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 16.8%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 8.8%), and currently married (46.6% compared to 42.9%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 1.3%), births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 37.1%, a difference of 2.3%), and family households with children (28.2% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 39.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 10.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 3.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 7.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 9.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 104.2%), high school diploma (88.4% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 7.9%), and 10th grade (94.1% compared to 87.9%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of associate's degree (38.6% compared to 38.5%, a difference of 0.29%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 1.9%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 59.2%), disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 42.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 41.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 4.2%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 4.4%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 11.2%).