Chickasaw vs Ottawa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 30,833,515 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Ottawa within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.701. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.033% in Ottawa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 33.4 Ottawa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Ottawa communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $47,366, a difference of 5.8%), median female earnings ($34,414 compared to $33,378, a difference of 3.1%), and median male earnings ($47,832 compared to $46,611, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 0.70%), householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $53,217, a difference of 0.97%), and median family income ($85,356 compared to $86,380, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Ottawa communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.3% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 11.6%), married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 11.5%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 0.070%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.0% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 0.52%), and single female poverty (26.3% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Ottawa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 26.5%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 21.3%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 0.88%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 1.2%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.7% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Ottawa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 43.0%, a difference of 12.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 76.8%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.9% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 62.0%, a difference of 0.44%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 0.53%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 0.58%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Ottawa communities in the United States are seen in family households with children (28.2% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 8.3%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 8.2%), and divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.6% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 0.18%), married-couple households (45.9% compared to 45.8%, a difference of 0.19%), and births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 36.5%, a difference of 0.48%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Ottawa communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 12.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 10.3%), and no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 0.47%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 57.9%, a difference of 2.0%), and no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Ottawa communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 4.9%), associate's degree (38.6% compared to 40.3%, a difference of 4.3%), and no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.070%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.070%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.070%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Ottawa communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 26.9%), disability age 65 to 74 (30.2% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 18.0%), and hearing disability (4.5% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (6.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 0.50%), disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 1.7%), and cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 1.8%).