Chickasaw vs Seminole Community Comparison

COMPARE

Chickasaw
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Seminole
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Chickasaw

Seminole

Fair
Poor
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,239
SOCIAL INDEX
19.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
265th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Seminole Integration in Chickasaw Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 73,224,417 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Seminole within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.061. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.020% in Seminole. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 19.9 Seminole.
Chickasaw Integration in Seminole Communities

Chickasaw vs Seminole Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Seminole communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 6.3%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $80,077, a difference of 2.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $52,373, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($34,414 compared to $34,385, a difference of 0.080%), per capita income ($36,475 compared to $36,180, a difference of 0.81%), and median household income ($70,005 compared to $69,420, a difference of 0.84%).
Chickasaw vs Seminole Income
Income MetricChickasawSeminole
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$36,475
Tragic
$36,180
Median Family Income
Tragic
$85,356
Tragic
$83,354
Median Household Income
Tragic
$70,005
Tragic
$69,420
Median Earnings
Tragic
$40,672
Tragic
$40,233
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$47,832
Tragic
$46,783
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,414
Tragic
$34,385
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$44,763
Tragic
$45,649
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$77,929
Tragic
$76,584
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$82,193
Tragic
$80,077
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,732
Tragic
$52,373
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.2%
Good
25.6%

Chickasaw vs Seminole Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Seminole communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 13.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 12.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (16.3% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 1.9%), single female poverty (26.3% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 2.0%), and single mother poverty (34.4% compared to 35.8%, a difference of 4.1%).
Chickasaw vs Seminole Poverty
Poverty MetricChickasawSeminole
Poverty
Tragic
14.7%
Tragic
15.6%
Families
Tragic
10.8%
Tragic
11.9%
Males
Tragic
13.5%
Tragic
14.3%
Females
Tragic
15.9%
Tragic
16.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
24.5%
Tragic
22.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.0%
Tragic
18.3%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
21.8%
Tragic
22.8%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.5%
Tragic
21.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.8%
Tragic
21.5%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.6%
Tragic
21.2%
Single Males
Tragic
16.3%
Tragic
16.0%
Single Females
Tragic
26.3%
Tragic
26.8%
Single Fathers
Tragic
19.0%
Tragic
18.1%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.4%
Tragic
35.8%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
6.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Good
10.7%
Tragic
12.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
12.9%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.1%
Tragic
14.8%

Chickasaw vs Seminole Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Seminole communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 15.6%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 14.6%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.20%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 2.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 3.0%).
Chickasaw vs Seminole Unemployment
Unemployment MetricChickasawSeminole
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
5.4%
Males
Excellent
5.2%
Tragic
5.6%
Females
Excellent
5.1%
Poor
5.4%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.2%
Fair
11.7%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.7%
Tragic
18.2%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Excellent
10.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Fair
6.7%
Tragic
7.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.2%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
4.9%
Tragic
5.2%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
4.8%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Good
4.8%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Poor
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.3%
Exceptional
7.1%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.0%
Tragic
8.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Tragic
9.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.4%
Tragic
6.0%

Chickasaw vs Seminole Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Seminole communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 80.8%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 0.90%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 0.16%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 0.23%), and in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 62.0%, a difference of 0.47%).
Chickasaw vs Seminole Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricChickasawSeminole
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
62.3%
Tragic
62.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
76.2%
Tragic
75.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.3%
Exceptional
38.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Poor
74.5%
Tragic
74.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
81.9%
Tragic
81.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.9%
Tragic
80.8%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
80.9%
Tragic
80.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
79.0%
Tragic
78.1%

Chickasaw vs Seminole Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Seminole communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 6.1%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 5.0%), and births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 0.36%), family households (64.4% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 0.65%), and average family size (3.19 compared to 3.24, a difference of 1.6%).
Chickasaw vs Seminole Family Structure
Family Structure MetricChickasawSeminole
Family Households
Good
64.4%
Poor
64.0%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.2%
Average
27.5%
Married-couple Households
Fair
45.9%
Tragic
44.0%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.19
Good
3.24
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.8%
Tragic
2.6%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.0%
Tragic
7.4%
Currently Married
Average
46.6%
Tragic
44.6%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
14.2%
Tragic
14.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.3%
Tragic
37.9%

Chickasaw vs Seminole Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Seminole communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 14.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 6.2%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 91.1%, a difference of 1.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 5.0%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 5.8%).
Chickasaw vs Seminole Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricChickasawSeminole
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.9%
Exceptional
9.0%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.3%
Exceptional
91.1%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.0%
Excellent
56.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.2%
Exceptional
20.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.4%
Exceptional
7.0%

Chickasaw vs Seminole Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Seminole communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 13.4%), no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 13.3%), and professional degree (3.4% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.24%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.24%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.24%).
Chickasaw vs Seminole Education Level
Education Level MetricChickasawSeminole
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Exceptional
1.9%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.1%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.1%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.0%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Excellent
97.9%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Excellent
97.7%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Excellent
97.5%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Excellent
97.2%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Good
96.2%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Good
95.8%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.5%
Average
94.8%
10th Grade
Excellent
94.1%
Poor
93.3%
11th Grade
Fair
92.3%
Tragic
91.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.3%
Tragic
89.4%
High School Diploma
Poor
88.4%
Tragic
87.3%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.8%
Tragic
82.8%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
60.4%
Tragic
59.1%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.3%
Tragic
52.1%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.6%
Tragic
37.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.4%
Tragic
29.4%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.4%
Tragic
11.0%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.4%
Tragic
3.2%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Tragic
1.3%

Chickasaw vs Seminole Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Seminole communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.5% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 9.5%), disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 6.3%), and disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (8.0% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 0.070%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 0.51%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 0.60%).
Chickasaw vs Seminole Disability
Disability MetricChickasawSeminole
Disability
Tragic
15.2%
Tragic
14.9%
Males
Tragic
15.1%
Tragic
14.7%
Females
Tragic
15.2%
Tragic
15.0%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.7%
Tragic
1.6%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.8%
Tragic
6.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.0%
Tragic
8.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.1%
Tragic
15.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
30.2%
Tragic
29.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
51.2%
Tragic
51.5%
Vision
Tragic
3.2%
Tragic
3.1%
Hearing
Tragic
4.5%
Tragic
4.1%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.5%
Tragic
18.3%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.0%
Tragic
8.0%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.9%
Tragic
2.9%