Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina Community Comparison

COMPARE

Chickasaw
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Chickasaw

Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina

Fair
Average
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,212
SOCIAL INDEX
59.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
160th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina Integration in Chickasaw Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 78,598,918 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.958. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.162% in Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 162.5 Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Chickasaw Integration in Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina Communities

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,475 compared to $42,278, a difference of 15.9%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $94,288, a difference of 14.7%), and median family income ($85,356 compared to $97,432, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $55,986, a difference of 4.2%), wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 24.8%, a difference of 9.3%), and median male earnings ($47,832 compared to $52,869, a difference of 10.5%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina Income
Income MetricChickasawImmigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$36,475
Poor
$42,278
Median Family Income
Tragic
$85,356
Tragic
$97,432
Median Household Income
Tragic
$70,005
Tragic
$79,888
Median Earnings
Tragic
$40,672
Fair
$45,600
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$47,832
Poor
$52,869
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,414
Poor
$38,886
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$44,763
Tragic
$50,565
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$77,929
Tragic
$88,819
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$82,193
Tragic
$94,288
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,732
Tragic
$55,986
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.2%
Exceptional
24.8%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.3% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 34.3%), family poverty (10.8% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 29.1%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.0% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 26.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.65%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 3.0%), and receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 15.5%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina Poverty
Poverty MetricChickasawImmigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina
Poverty
Tragic
14.7%
Good
12.0%
Families
Tragic
10.8%
Excellent
8.4%
Males
Tragic
13.5%
Good
11.0%
Females
Tragic
15.9%
Good
13.2%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
24.5%
Excellent
19.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.0%
Average
13.4%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
21.8%
Fair
17.5%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.5%
Fair
16.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.8%
Average
16.4%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.6%
Fair
16.8%
Single Males
Tragic
16.3%
Exceptional
12.1%
Single Females
Tragic
26.3%
Average
21.1%
Single Fathers
Tragic
19.0%
Exceptional
15.2%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.4%
Average
29.2%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Good
10.7%
Exceptional
10.4%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
11.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.1%
Good
11.3%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 31.7%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 22.6%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.3% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 1.8%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 3.7%), and unemployment (5.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 4.9%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina Unemployment
Unemployment MetricChickasawImmigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.8%
Males
Excellent
5.2%
Exceptional
4.9%
Females
Excellent
5.1%
Exceptional
4.7%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
10.6%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.7%
Exceptional
15.3%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Exceptional
9.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Fair
6.7%
Exceptional
5.7%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
4.9%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
4.0%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Good
4.8%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Good
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.4%
Good
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.3%
Excellent
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.0%
Exceptional
7.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Exceptional
8.2%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.4%
Exceptional
5.0%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 41.8%, a difference of 9.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 6.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 80.8%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 4.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 5.4%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricChickasawImmigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
62.3%
Exceptional
66.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
76.2%
Exceptional
80.8%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.3%
Exceptional
41.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Poor
74.5%
Exceptional
78.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
81.9%
Exceptional
86.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.9%
Exceptional
85.8%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
80.9%
Exceptional
85.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
79.0%
Exceptional
83.3%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 19.7%), single father households (2.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 16.9%), and divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.6% compared to 46.1%, a difference of 1.1%), average family size (3.19 compared to 3.15, a difference of 1.2%), and married-couple households (45.9% compared to 44.4%, a difference of 3.3%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina Family Structure
Family Structure MetricChickasawImmigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina
Family Households
Good
64.4%
Tragic
61.9%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.2%
Tragic
26.8%
Married-couple Households
Fair
45.9%
Tragic
44.4%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.19
Tragic
3.15
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.8%
Average
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.0%
Average
6.3%
Currently Married
Average
46.6%
Fair
46.1%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
14.2%
Tragic
12.4%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.3%
Excellent
30.3%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 39.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 26.7%), and no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 26.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 2.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 53.8%, a difference of 9.7%), and no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 26.4%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricChickasawImmigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.9%
Good
9.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.3%
Good
90.1%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.0%
Tragic
53.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.2%
Tragic
17.5%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.4%
Tragic
5.3%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 25.3%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 25.3%), and bachelor's degree (30.4% compared to 37.6%, a difference of 23.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (94.1% compared to 94.2%, a difference of 0.13%), 8th grade (96.4% compared to 96.2%, a difference of 0.28%), and 9th grade (95.5% compared to 95.2%, a difference of 0.30%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina Education Level
Education Level MetricChickasawImmigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Fair
2.1%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.4%
Average
98.0%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.4%
Average
97.9%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Average
97.9%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Average
97.9%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Average
97.8%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Good
97.6%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Good
97.4%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Good
97.2%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Exceptional
96.4%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Exceptional
96.2%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.5%
Excellent
95.2%
10th Grade
Excellent
94.1%
Excellent
94.2%
11th Grade
Fair
92.3%
Excellent
93.0%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.3%
Excellent
91.7%
High School Diploma
Poor
88.4%
Excellent
89.8%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.8%
Good
86.3%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
60.4%
Average
65.4%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.3%
Average
59.2%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.6%
Average
46.3%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.4%
Average
37.6%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.4%
Fair
14.3%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.4%
Tragic
4.0%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Tragic
1.7%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 50.3%), hearing disability (4.5% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 44.9%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 41.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 6.1%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 9.4%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 15.9%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina Disability
Disability MetricChickasawImmigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina
Disability
Tragic
15.2%
Poor
11.9%
Males
Tragic
15.1%
Fair
11.4%
Females
Tragic
15.2%
Poor
12.4%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.7%
Fair
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.8%
Fair
5.7%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.0%
Poor
6.8%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.1%
Fair
11.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
30.2%
Average
23.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
51.2%
Excellent
46.8%
Vision
Tragic
3.2%
Excellent
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
4.5%
Fair
3.1%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.5%
Fair
17.4%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.0%
Fair
6.2%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.9%
Average
2.5%