Chickasaw vs Celtic Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Celtic
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chickasaw
Celtics
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
5,342
SOCIAL INDEX
50.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
179th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Celtic Integration in Chickasaw Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 86,461,279 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.425. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.050% in Celtics. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 50.1 Celtics.
Chickasaw vs Celtic Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $98,896, a difference of 20.3%), per capita income ($36,475 compared to $43,621, a difference of 19.6%), and median household income ($70,005 compared to $83,193, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 0.37%), median female earnings ($34,414 compared to $38,283, a difference of 11.2%), and median earnings ($40,672 compared to $45,732, a difference of 12.4%).
Income Metric | Chickasaw | Celtic |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,475 | Average $43,621 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $85,356 | Fair $101,139 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,005 | Fair $83,193 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,672 | Fair $45,732 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,832 | Average $54,242 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,414 | Tragic $38,283 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,763 | Tragic $50,447 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,929 | Fair $92,241 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,193 | Fair $98,896 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,732 | Average $60,608 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.2% | Tragic 27.3% |
Chickasaw vs Celtic Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (10.8% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 22.9%), child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 21.9%), and married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 21.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (19.0% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 2.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 5.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 8.8%).
Poverty Metric | Chickasaw | Celtic |
Poverty | Tragic 14.7% | Average 12.3% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Good 8.8% |
Males | Tragic 13.5% | Average 11.2% |
Females | Tragic 15.9% | Average 13.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.5% | Tragic 21.6% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.0% | Tragic 14.5% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.8% | Poor 17.9% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Fair 16.4% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.8% | Average 16.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Fair 17.0% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.3% | Tragic 14.5% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.3% | Tragic 22.7% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.0% | Tragic 18.5% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.4% | Tragic 30.9% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.1% | Excellent 10.9% |
Chickasaw vs Celtic Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 26.7%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 17.6%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 0.39%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.43%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 1.1%).
Unemployment Metric | Chickasaw | Celtic |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Males | Excellent 5.2% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Average 17.6% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.7% | Tragic 6.9% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.2% | Good 5.4% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Good 4.7% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Excellent 4.4% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Excellent 5.3% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.3% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 8.3% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Tragic 9.5% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Good 5.4% |
Chickasaw vs Celtic Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 41.3%, a difference of 7.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.9% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 2.5%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 3.3%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chickasaw | Celtic |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.3% | Tragic 63.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.2% | Tragic 78.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.3% | Exceptional 41.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Exceptional 77.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.9% | Average 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Tragic 84.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.9% | Tragic 83.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.0% | Tragic 81.8% |
Chickasaw vs Celtic Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 18.2%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 14.8%), and divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 0.99%), average family size (3.19 compared to 3.11, a difference of 2.4%), and currently married (46.6% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 2.6%).
Family Structure Metric | Chickasaw | Celtic |
Family Households | Good 64.4% | Tragic 63.8% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.2% | Tragic 26.6% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 45.9% | Excellent 47.3% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Tragic 3.11 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Average 2.3% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Good 6.1% |
Currently Married | Average 46.6% | Exceptional 47.8% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.2% | Tragic 13.0% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.3% | Poor 33.3% |
Chickasaw vs Celtic Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 4.9%), no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 2.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 92.1%, a difference of 0.19%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 0.28%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 2.5%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chickasaw | Celtic |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Exceptional 8.1% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Exceptional 92.1% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.0% | Exceptional 59.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.2% | Exceptional 21.7% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Exceptional 7.1% |
Chickasaw vs Celtic Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 30.6%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 29.2%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 24.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.060%), 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.060%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.070%).
Education Level Metric | Chickasaw | Celtic |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Exceptional 1.6% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.5% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.4% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.4% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.3% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 98.1% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 98.0% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Exceptional 97.8% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Exceptional 97.1% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Exceptional 96.8% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Exceptional 96.0% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Exceptional 95.0% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Exceptional 93.7% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.3% | Exceptional 92.3% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.4% | Exceptional 90.6% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.8% | Exceptional 86.7% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.4% | Good 65.9% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.3% | Average 59.4% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Fair 45.8% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.4% | Fair 37.0% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Average 14.8% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Average 4.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Good 1.9% |
Chickasaw vs Celtic Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 32.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 25.3%), and disability age 65 to 74 (30.2% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 24.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 4.0%), cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 7.9%), and disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 8.4%).
Disability Metric | Chickasaw | Celtic |
Disability | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 13.1% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Tragic 13.0% |
Females | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 13.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Tragic 1.7% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.8% | Tragic 6.3% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 7.6% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Tragic 12.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Tragic 24.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.2% | Average 47.2% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 2.4% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.5% | Good 17.1% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.0% | Tragic 6.7% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Tragic 2.6% |