Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Belarus Community Comparison

COMPARE

Chickasaw
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Belarus
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Chickasaw

Immigrants from Belarus

Fair
Good
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,566
SOCIAL INDEX
73.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
113th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Belarus Integration in Chickasaw Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 74,666,806 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Belarus within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.187. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.008% in Immigrants from Belarus. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to a decrease of 8.1 Immigrants from Belarus.
Chickasaw Integration in Immigrants from Belarus Communities

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Belarus Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,475 compared to $50,303, a difference of 37.9%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $107,393, a difference of 37.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $111,430, a difference of 35.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 5.6%), householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $62,162, a difference of 15.7%), and householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $55,743, a difference of 24.5%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Belarus Income
Income MetricChickasawImmigrants from Belarus
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$36,475
Exceptional
$50,303
Median Family Income
Tragic
$85,356
Exceptional
$114,586
Median Household Income
Tragic
$70,005
Exceptional
$94,399
Median Earnings
Tragic
$40,672
Exceptional
$53,043
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$47,832
Exceptional
$62,658
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,414
Exceptional
$44,757
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$44,763
Exceptional
$55,743
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$77,929
Exceptional
$107,393
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$82,193
Exceptional
$111,430
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,732
Good
$62,162
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.2%
Average
25.7%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Belarus Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 48.8%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.0% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 42.2%), and single male poverty (16.3% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 37.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 7.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 10.1%), and receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 13.6%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Belarus Poverty
Poverty MetricChickasawImmigrants from Belarus
Poverty
Tragic
14.7%
Exceptional
11.6%
Families
Tragic
10.8%
Excellent
8.5%
Males
Tragic
13.5%
Excellent
10.7%
Females
Tragic
15.9%
Excellent
12.8%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
24.5%
Exceptional
18.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.0%
Exceptional
12.0%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
21.8%
Exceptional
14.7%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.5%
Exceptional
14.7%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.8%
Exceptional
15.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.6%
Exceptional
14.8%
Single Males
Tragic
16.3%
Exceptional
11.8%
Single Females
Tragic
26.3%
Exceptional
19.3%
Single Fathers
Tragic
19.0%
Exceptional
15.8%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.4%
Exceptional
27.4%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.8%
Fair
5.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Good
10.7%
Tragic
11.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
13.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.1%
Good
11.5%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Belarus Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 36.2%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 16.0%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.43%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 2.2%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.5%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Belarus Unemployment
Unemployment MetricChickasawImmigrants from Belarus
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Fair
5.3%
Males
Excellent
5.2%
Fair
5.4%
Females
Excellent
5.1%
Fair
5.3%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
12.1%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.7%
Tragic
18.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Tragic
10.7%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Fair
6.7%
Excellent
6.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.2%
Good
5.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
4.9%
Good
4.6%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Fair
4.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Good
4.8%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.4%
Good
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.3%
Exceptional
8.0%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.0%
Exceptional
6.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Exceptional
8.4%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.4%
Good
5.3%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Belarus Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 33.4%, a difference of 14.6%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 5.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 73.0%, a difference of 2.0%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 4.0%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Belarus Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricChickasawImmigrants from Belarus
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
62.3%
Good
65.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
76.2%
Exceptional
80.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.3%
Tragic
33.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Poor
74.5%
Tragic
73.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
81.9%
Excellent
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.9%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
80.9%
Exceptional
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
79.0%
Exceptional
83.3%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Belarus Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 48.1%), births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 41.5%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 28.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.19 compared to 3.17, a difference of 0.47%), family households (64.4% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and married-couple households (45.9% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 2.7%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Belarus Family Structure
Family Structure MetricChickasawImmigrants from Belarus
Family Households
Good
64.4%
Tragic
63.7%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.2%
Tragic
26.8%
Married-couple Households
Fair
45.9%
Excellent
47.2%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.19
Tragic
3.17
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.8%
Exceptional
1.9%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.0%
Exceptional
5.5%
Currently Married
Average
46.6%
Exceptional
48.1%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
14.2%
Exceptional
11.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.3%
Exceptional
25.6%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Belarus Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 113.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 56.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 43.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 10.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 23.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 43.0%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Belarus Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricChickasawImmigrants from Belarus
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.9%
Tragic
16.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.3%
Tragic
83.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.0%
Tragic
47.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.2%
Tragic
15.5%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.4%
Tragic
4.7%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Belarus Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.4% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 65.4%), professional degree (3.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 64.6%), and bachelor's degree (30.4% compared to 45.0%, a difference of 48.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.5% compared to 95.2%, a difference of 0.24%), 10th grade (94.1% compared to 94.4%, a difference of 0.32%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.44%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Belarus Education Level
Education Level MetricChickasawImmigrants from Belarus
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Average
2.1%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.4%
Average
98.0%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.4%
Fair
97.9%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Fair
97.9%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Average
97.8%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Average
97.7%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Average
97.5%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Average
97.3%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Good
97.1%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Excellent
96.3%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Excellent
96.0%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.5%
Excellent
95.2%
10th Grade
Excellent
94.1%
Exceptional
94.4%
11th Grade
Fair
92.3%
Exceptional
93.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.3%
Exceptional
92.2%
High School Diploma
Poor
88.4%
Exceptional
90.2%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.8%
Exceptional
87.3%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
60.4%
Exceptional
69.2%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.3%
Exceptional
64.1%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.6%
Exceptional
52.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.4%
Exceptional
45.0%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.4%
Exceptional
18.9%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.4%
Exceptional
5.5%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
2.2%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Belarus Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 70.2%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 65.9%), and vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 59.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 8.1%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 8.8%), and cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 12.3%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Belarus Disability
Disability MetricChickasawImmigrants from Belarus
Disability
Tragic
15.2%
Exceptional
11.1%
Males
Tragic
15.1%
Exceptional
10.4%
Females
Tragic
15.2%
Exceptional
11.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.7%
Exceptional
1.0%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.8%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.0%
Exceptional
5.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.1%
Exceptional
9.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
30.2%
Exceptional
21.7%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
51.2%
Good
47.1%
Vision
Tragic
3.2%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Tragic
4.5%
Exceptional
2.8%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.5%
Exceptional
16.5%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.0%
Good
6.1%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.9%
Tragic
2.6%