Chickasaw vs Dominican Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 115,202,819 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Dominicans within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.189. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.035% in Dominicans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 35.0 Dominicans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Dominican communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 31.9%), householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $46,964, a difference of 14.4%), and householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $49,633, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($47,832 compared to $47,204, a difference of 1.3%), median household income ($70,005 compared to $71,302, a difference of 1.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $80,623, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Dominican communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 68.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 67.0%), and receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 63.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (34.4% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 0.20%), single father poverty (19.0% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 0.71%), and single female poverty (26.3% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Dominican communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (5.2% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 46.4%), unemployment (5.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 46.1%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 46.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 1.8%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 18.9%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 23.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Dominican communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 31.2%, a difference of 22.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Dominican communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 30.3%), married-couple households (45.9% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 20.3%), and currently married (46.6% compared to 39.5%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 1.6%), family households with children (28.2% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 2.6%), and average family size (3.19 compared to 3.34, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Dominican communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 274.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 111.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 97.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 70.7%, a difference of 30.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 67.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 97.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Dominican communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 89.4%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 11.5%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.6%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.7%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Dominican communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 75.8%), disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 51.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 38.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 1.0%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 50.2%, a difference of 2.1%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 4.8%).