Chickasaw vs Albanian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Chickasaw
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Albanian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Chickasaw

Albanians

Fair
Good
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,071
SOCIAL INDEX
68.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
131st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Albanian Integration in Chickasaw Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 84,632,864 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Albanians within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.386. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.044% in Albanians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 43.8 Albanians.
Chickasaw Integration in Albanian Communities

Chickasaw vs Albanian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Albanian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $101,367, a difference of 30.1%), per capita income ($36,475 compared to $47,379, a difference of 29.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $106,243, a difference of 29.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 6.8%), householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $60,249, a difference of 12.1%), and householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $53,794, a difference of 20.2%).
Chickasaw vs Albanian Income
Income MetricChickasawAlbanian
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$36,475
Exceptional
$47,379
Median Family Income
Tragic
$85,356
Exceptional
$109,136
Median Household Income
Tragic
$70,005
Exceptional
$89,744
Median Earnings
Tragic
$40,672
Exceptional
$50,116
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$47,832
Exceptional
$58,680
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,414
Exceptional
$42,584
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$44,763
Exceptional
$53,794
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$77,929
Exceptional
$101,367
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$82,193
Exceptional
$106,243
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,732
Fair
$60,249
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.2%
Good
25.4%

Chickasaw vs Albanian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Albanian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.0% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 36.4%), child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 36.2%), and single female poverty (26.3% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 35.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 4.9%), receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 9.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 9.5%).
Chickasaw vs Albanian Poverty
Poverty MetricChickasawAlbanian
Poverty
Tragic
14.7%
Exceptional
11.7%
Families
Tragic
10.8%
Excellent
8.5%
Males
Tragic
13.5%
Exceptional
10.6%
Females
Tragic
15.9%
Exceptional
12.7%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
24.5%
Exceptional
18.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.0%
Exceptional
12.5%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
21.8%
Exceptional
16.0%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.5%
Excellent
15.2%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.8%
Excellent
15.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.6%
Exceptional
15.4%
Single Males
Tragic
16.3%
Exceptional
12.4%
Single Females
Tragic
26.3%
Exceptional
19.4%
Single Fathers
Tragic
19.0%
Tragic
17.2%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.4%
Exceptional
27.9%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.8%
Good
5.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Good
10.7%
Fair
11.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
12.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.1%
Fair
12.0%

Chickasaw vs Albanian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Albanian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 25.3%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 18.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 0.53%), female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 1.6%).
Chickasaw vs Albanian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricChickasawAlbanian
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Average
5.3%
Males
Excellent
5.2%
Poor
5.4%
Females
Excellent
5.1%
Good
5.2%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
12.1%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.7%
Tragic
18.2%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Tragic
10.8%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Fair
6.7%
Average
6.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.2%
Good
5.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
4.9%
Good
4.6%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Fair
4.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Good
4.8%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Poor
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
5.2%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.3%
Good
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.0%
Exceptional
7.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.4%
Exceptional
5.1%

Chickasaw vs Albanian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Albanian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 5.3%), in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 5.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.9% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 0.20%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 85.7%, a difference of 4.7%).
Chickasaw vs Albanian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricChickasawAlbanian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
62.3%
Good
65.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
76.2%
Exceptional
80.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.3%
Average
36.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Poor
74.5%
Poor
74.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
81.9%
Exceptional
85.5%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.9%
Exceptional
85.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
80.9%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
79.0%
Exceptional
83.3%

Chickasaw vs Albanian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Albanian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 38.8%), births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 27.1%), and divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 23.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (45.9% compared to 46.1%, a difference of 0.41%), average family size (3.19 compared to 3.17, a difference of 0.68%), and currently married (46.6% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 0.79%).
Chickasaw vs Albanian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricChickasawAlbanian
Family Households
Good
64.4%
Tragic
63.5%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.2%
Tragic
26.5%
Married-couple Households
Fair
45.9%
Fair
46.1%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.19
Tragic
3.17
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.8%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.0%
Exceptional
5.9%
Currently Married
Average
46.6%
Good
47.0%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
14.2%
Exceptional
11.5%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.3%
Exceptional
28.5%

Chickasaw vs Albanian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Albanian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 99.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 55.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 40.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 9.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 20.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 40.5%).
Chickasaw vs Albanian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricChickasawAlbanian
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.9%
Tragic
15.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.3%
Tragic
84.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.0%
Tragic
49.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.2%
Tragic
15.8%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.4%
Tragic
4.8%

Chickasaw vs Albanian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Albanian communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.4% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 48.7%), professional degree (3.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 45.5%), and bachelor's degree (30.4% compared to 40.9%, a difference of 34.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (94.1% compared to 94.1%, a difference of 0.070%), 9th grade (95.5% compared to 95.1%, a difference of 0.41%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.42%).
Chickasaw vs Albanian Education Level
Education Level MetricChickasawAlbanian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Good
2.1%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.4%
Average
98.0%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.4%
Average
97.9%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Average
97.9%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Average
97.9%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Average
97.8%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Good
97.6%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Good
97.4%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Average
97.1%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Excellent
96.3%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Excellent
96.0%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.5%
Good
95.1%
10th Grade
Excellent
94.1%
Excellent
94.1%
11th Grade
Fair
92.3%
Excellent
93.0%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.3%
Excellent
91.8%
High School Diploma
Poor
88.4%
Excellent
89.8%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.8%
Excellent
86.6%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
60.4%
Good
65.9%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.3%
Good
60.4%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.6%
Exceptional
48.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.4%
Exceptional
40.9%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.4%
Exceptional
17.0%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.4%
Exceptional
4.9%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Good
1.9%

Chickasaw vs Albanian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Albanian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 53.8%), disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 52.5%), and hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 51.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 9.9%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 10.6%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 10.9%).
Chickasaw vs Albanian Disability
Disability MetricChickasawAlbanian
Disability
Tragic
15.2%
Average
11.7%
Males
Tragic
15.1%
Good
11.1%
Females
Tragic
15.2%
Fair
12.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.7%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.8%
Excellent
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.0%
Excellent
6.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.1%
Exceptional
10.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
30.2%
Exceptional
22.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
51.2%
Exceptional
46.3%
Vision
Tragic
3.2%
Exceptional
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
4.5%
Good
2.9%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.5%
Exceptional
16.8%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.0%
Poor
6.2%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.9%
Tragic
2.6%