Chickasaw vs Indonesian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 84,480,065 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Indonesians within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.003. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Indonesians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to a decrease of 0.6 Indonesians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Indonesian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 19.6%), median female earnings ($34,414 compared to $36,140, a difference of 5.0%), and median household income ($70,005 compared to $72,856, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($47,832 compared to $47,503, a difference of 0.69%), householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $54,176, a difference of 0.83%), and householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $45,566, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Indonesian communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.3% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 15.7%), married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 9.3%), and single father poverty (19.0% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 2.0%), male poverty (13.5% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 2.6%), and poverty (14.7% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Indonesian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 19.7%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 16.5%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.43%), male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.0%), and unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Indonesian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 66.3%, a difference of 6.4%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 40.7%, a difference of 6.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 2.9%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Indonesian communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 12.8%), married-couple households (45.9% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 9.2%), and single father households (2.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.2% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 0.36%), average family size (3.19 compared to 3.28, a difference of 2.8%), and births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 35.0%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Indonesian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 31.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 24.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 21.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 2.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 53.4%, a difference of 10.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 21.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Indonesian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 89.4%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 10.7%), and bachelor's degree (30.4% compared to 33.5%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (60.4% compared to 61.2%, a difference of 1.3%), ged/equivalency (83.8% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 1.5%), and 2nd grade (98.3% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Indonesian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 51.1%), hearing disability (4.5% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 49.5%), and vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 41.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 1.1%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 6.3%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 15.4%).