Chickasaw vs Immigrants from France Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 110,790,405 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from France within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.737. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.076% in Immigrants from France. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 76.5 Immigrants from France.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from France communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,475 compared to $54,557, a difference of 49.6%), median family income ($85,356 compared to $120,076, a difference of 40.7%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $108,257, a difference of 38.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.82%), householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $53,805, a difference of 20.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $66,826, a difference of 24.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from France communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 39.6%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.0% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 35.3%), and single female poverty (26.3% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 33.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 3.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 8.0%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 14.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from France communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 29.8%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 20.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.060%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.14%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 0.22%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from France communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 35.1%, a difference of 9.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 5.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 0.45%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from France communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 35.7%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 26.3%), and births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 25.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.6% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 0.80%), married-couple households (45.9% compared to 45.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and average family size (3.19 compared to 3.15, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from France communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 64.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 31.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 25.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 87.1%, a difference of 5.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 13.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 25.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from France communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 102.3%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 89.6%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 77.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.5% compared to 95.5%, a difference of 0.030%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.18%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.19%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from France communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 59.6%), vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 57.2%), and hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 53.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 6.4%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 45.8%, a difference of 11.8%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 24.1%).