Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Pakistan Community Comparison

COMPARE

Chickasaw
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Pakistan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Chickasaw

Immigrants from Pakistan

Fair
Good
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,130
SOCIAL INDEX
78.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
86th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Pakistan Integration in Chickasaw Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 108,417,346 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Pakistan within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.070. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.007% in Immigrants from Pakistan. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 7.5 Immigrants from Pakistan.
Chickasaw Integration in Immigrants from Pakistan Communities

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Pakistan Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Pakistan communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($70,005 compared to $97,528, a difference of 39.3%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $114,434, a difference of 39.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $106,129, a difference of 36.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 0.54%), householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $66,617, a difference of 24.0%), and median female earnings ($34,414 compared to $43,052, a difference of 25.1%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Pakistan Income
Income MetricChickasawImmigrants from Pakistan
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$36,475
Exceptional
$47,084
Median Family Income
Tragic
$85,356
Exceptional
$114,406
Median Household Income
Tragic
$70,005
Exceptional
$97,528
Median Earnings
Tragic
$40,672
Exceptional
$51,693
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$47,832
Exceptional
$60,987
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,414
Exceptional
$43,052
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$44,763
Exceptional
$56,789
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$77,929
Exceptional
$106,129
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$82,193
Exceptional
$114,434
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,732
Exceptional
$66,617
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.2%
Tragic
27.0%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Pakistan Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Pakistan communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.0% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 47.6%), child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 46.1%), and single male poverty (16.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 45.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 2.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 5.0%), and married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 18.8%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Pakistan Poverty
Poverty MetricChickasawImmigrants from Pakistan
Poverty
Tragic
14.7%
Exceptional
10.8%
Families
Tragic
10.8%
Exceptional
8.0%
Males
Tragic
13.5%
Exceptional
9.9%
Females
Tragic
15.9%
Exceptional
11.8%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
24.5%
Exceptional
17.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.0%
Exceptional
11.5%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
21.8%
Exceptional
14.9%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.5%
Exceptional
14.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.8%
Exceptional
14.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.6%
Exceptional
14.2%
Single Males
Tragic
16.3%
Exceptional
11.2%
Single Females
Tragic
26.3%
Exceptional
18.4%
Single Fathers
Tragic
19.0%
Exceptional
15.0%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.4%
Exceptional
26.0%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Good
10.7%
Exceptional
10.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.6%
Good
12.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.1%
Exceptional
10.4%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Pakistan Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Pakistan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 24.5%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 18.2%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 0.43%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 0.50%), and male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.1%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Pakistan Unemployment
Unemployment MetricChickasawImmigrants from Pakistan
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Excellent
5.1%
Males
Excellent
5.2%
Exceptional
5.1%
Females
Excellent
5.1%
Good
5.2%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.2%
Poor
11.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.7%
Exceptional
17.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Tragic
10.6%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Fair
6.7%
Good
6.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.2%
Excellent
5.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
4.9%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Good
4.8%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Excellent
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Poor
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.4%
Poor
5.2%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.3%
Good
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.0%
Exceptional
7.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.4%
Exceptional
5.2%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Pakistan Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Pakistan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 10.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 66.7%, a difference of 7.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 0.93%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 3.6%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Pakistan Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricChickasawImmigrants from Pakistan
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
62.3%
Exceptional
66.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
76.2%
Exceptional
80.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.3%
Tragic
34.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Poor
74.5%
Tragic
73.8%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
81.9%
Good
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.9%
Good
84.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
80.9%
Exceptional
84.9%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
79.0%
Exceptional
83.8%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Pakistan Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Pakistan communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 33.5%), divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 31.8%), and single father households (2.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 30.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.19 compared to 3.30, a difference of 3.5%), family households (64.4% compared to 67.7%, a difference of 5.1%), and currently married (46.6% compared to 49.1%, a difference of 5.3%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Pakistan Family Structure
Family Structure MetricChickasawImmigrants from Pakistan
Family Households
Good
64.4%
Exceptional
67.7%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.2%
Exceptional
30.2%
Married-couple Households
Fair
45.9%
Exceptional
50.1%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.19
Exceptional
3.30
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.8%
Exceptional
2.1%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.0%
Excellent
6.0%
Currently Married
Average
46.6%
Exceptional
49.1%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
14.2%
Exceptional
10.8%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.3%
Exceptional
27.2%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Pakistan Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Pakistan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 45.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 16.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 4.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 56.1%, a difference of 5.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 12.2%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Pakistan Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricChickasawImmigrants from Pakistan
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.9%
Tragic
11.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.3%
Tragic
88.6%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.0%
Good
56.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.2%
Good
19.8%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.4%
Good
6.4%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Pakistan Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Pakistan communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.4% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 55.6%), professional degree (3.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 48.1%), and bachelor's degree (30.4% compared to 43.1%, a difference of 41.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.3% compared to 92.5%, a difference of 0.21%), 10th grade (94.1% compared to 93.6%, a difference of 0.51%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.70%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Pakistan Education Level
Education Level MetricChickasawImmigrants from Pakistan
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Tragic
2.3%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.7%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.7%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.6%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.6%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.5%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
97.2%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Tragic
97.0%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Tragic
96.7%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Tragic
95.7%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Tragic
95.4%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.5%
Poor
94.6%
10th Grade
Excellent
94.1%
Fair
93.6%
11th Grade
Fair
92.3%
Average
92.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.3%
Good
91.4%
High School Diploma
Poor
88.4%
Good
89.3%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.8%
Excellent
86.4%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
60.4%
Exceptional
68.0%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.3%
Exceptional
62.8%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.6%
Exceptional
50.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.4%
Exceptional
43.1%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.4%
Exceptional
17.8%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.4%
Exceptional
5.0%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
2.1%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Pakistan Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Pakistan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 71.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 69.6%), and vision disability (3.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 66.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 10.1%), cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 12.9%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 25.3%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Pakistan Disability
Disability MetricChickasawImmigrants from Pakistan
Disability
Tragic
15.2%
Exceptional
10.4%
Males
Tragic
15.1%
Exceptional
9.8%
Females
Tragic
15.2%
Exceptional
10.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.7%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.8%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.0%
Exceptional
5.8%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.1%
Exceptional
9.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
30.2%
Exceptional
21.5%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
51.2%
Exceptional
46.5%
Vision
Tragic
3.2%
Exceptional
1.9%
Hearing
Tragic
4.5%
Exceptional
2.6%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.5%
Exceptional
16.4%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.0%
Exceptional
5.5%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.9%
Exceptional
2.3%