Chickasaw vs South African Community Comparison

COMPARE

Chickasaw
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
South African
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Chickasaw

South Africans

Fair
Excellent
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,851
SOCIAL INDEX
86.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
44th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

South African Integration in Chickasaw Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 86,817,669 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of South Africans within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.070. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.005% in South Africans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to a decrease of 5.1 South Africans.
Chickasaw Integration in South African Communities

Chickasaw vs South African Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and South African communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,475 compared to $50,044, a difference of 37.2%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $109,719, a difference of 33.5%), and median household income ($70,005 compared to $93,379, a difference of 33.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 3.2%), householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $51,383, a difference of 14.8%), and median female earnings ($34,414 compared to $41,825, a difference of 21.5%).
Chickasaw vs South African Income
Income MetricChickasawSouth African
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$36,475
Exceptional
$50,044
Median Family Income
Tragic
$85,356
Exceptional
$113,229
Median Household Income
Tragic
$70,005
Exceptional
$93,379
Median Earnings
Tragic
$40,672
Exceptional
$50,752
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$47,832
Exceptional
$61,460
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,414
Exceptional
$41,825
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$44,763
Poor
$51,383
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$77,929
Exceptional
$103,160
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$82,193
Exceptional
$109,719
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,732
Exceptional
$65,652
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.2%
Tragic
28.0%

Chickasaw vs South African Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and South African communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 34.3%), family poverty (10.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 31.8%), and receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 31.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.20%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 4.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 15.9%).
Chickasaw vs South African Poverty
Poverty MetricChickasawSouth African
Poverty
Tragic
14.7%
Excellent
11.7%
Families
Tragic
10.8%
Exceptional
8.2%
Males
Tragic
13.5%
Excellent
10.7%
Females
Tragic
15.9%
Excellent
12.8%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
24.5%
Tragic
21.1%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.0%
Excellent
13.0%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
21.8%
Exceptional
16.2%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.5%
Exceptional
15.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.8%
Exceptional
15.2%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.6%
Excellent
15.5%
Single Males
Tragic
16.3%
Average
12.8%
Single Females
Tragic
26.3%
Excellent
20.4%
Single Fathers
Tragic
19.0%
Good
16.1%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.4%
Excellent
28.5%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
4.6%
Seniors Over 65 years
Good
10.7%
Exceptional
10.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.6%
Excellent
11.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.1%
Exceptional
10.0%

Chickasaw vs South African Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and South African communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 22.9%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 14.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.16%), unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.36%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 0.51%).
Chickasaw vs South African Unemployment
Unemployment MetricChickasawSouth African
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.1%
Males
Excellent
5.2%
Exceptional
5.0%
Females
Excellent
5.1%
Good
5.2%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
11.1%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.7%
Exceptional
16.9%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Excellent
10.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Fair
6.7%
Good
6.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.2%
Good
5.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
4.9%
Average
4.7%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Good
4.8%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Good
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.3%
Exceptional
7.5%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.0%
Exceptional
7.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Exceptional
8.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.4%
Good
5.4%

Chickasaw vs South African Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and South African communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 4.8%), in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 0.80%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 3.8%).
Chickasaw vs South African Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricChickasawSouth African
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
62.3%
Good
65.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
76.2%
Good
79.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.3%
Average
36.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Poor
74.5%
Average
75.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
81.9%
Excellent
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.9%
Excellent
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
80.9%
Fair
84.3%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
79.0%
Fair
82.6%

Chickasaw vs South African Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and South African communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 28.7%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 20.8%), and divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.19 compared to 3.17, a difference of 0.61%), family households (64.4% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 1.5%), and currently married (46.6% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 2.1%).
Chickasaw vs South African Family Structure
Family Structure MetricChickasawSouth African
Family Households
Good
64.4%
Tragic
63.4%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.2%
Average
27.4%
Married-couple Households
Fair
45.9%
Excellent
47.3%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.19
Tragic
3.17
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.8%
Exceptional
2.1%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.0%
Exceptional
5.8%
Currently Married
Average
46.6%
Exceptional
47.6%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
14.2%
Excellent
11.8%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.3%
Excellent
30.5%

Chickasaw vs South African Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and South African communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 30.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 19.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 2.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 4.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 15.0%).
Chickasaw vs South African Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricChickasawSouth African
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.9%
Good
10.2%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.3%
Good
90.0%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.0%
Excellent
56.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.2%
Fair
19.3%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.4%
Fair
6.2%

Chickasaw vs South African Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and South African communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 69.5%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 58.5%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 55.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (96.4% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 0.080%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.10%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.10%).
Chickasaw vs South African Education Level
Education Level MetricChickasawSouth African
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Exceptional
1.8%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
97.9%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
97.7%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Exceptional
97.5%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Exceptional
96.6%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Exceptional
96.4%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.5%
Exceptional
95.6%
10th Grade
Excellent
94.1%
Exceptional
94.7%
11th Grade
Fair
92.3%
Exceptional
93.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.3%
Exceptional
92.4%
High School Diploma
Poor
88.4%
Exceptional
90.6%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.8%
Exceptional
87.5%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
60.4%
Exceptional
69.7%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.3%
Exceptional
64.1%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.6%
Exceptional
51.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.4%
Exceptional
43.6%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.4%
Exceptional
18.1%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.4%
Exceptional
5.7%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
2.3%

Chickasaw vs South African Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and South African communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 55.5%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 50.9%), and vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 48.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 9.4%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 12.4%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 23.1%).
Chickasaw vs South African Disability
Disability MetricChickasawSouth African
Disability
Tragic
15.2%
Exceptional
11.4%
Males
Tragic
15.1%
Excellent
11.0%
Females
Tragic
15.2%
Exceptional
11.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.7%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.8%
Good
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.0%
Good
6.5%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.1%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
30.2%
Exceptional
21.9%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
51.2%
Exceptional
45.5%
Vision
Tragic
3.2%
Good
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
4.5%
Fair
3.1%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.5%
Exceptional
16.9%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.0%
Exceptional
5.9%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.9%
Exceptional
2.3%