Chickasaw vs Lebanese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 130,192,059 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Lebanese within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.694. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.043% in Lebanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 43.2 Lebanese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Lebanese communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $104,734, a difference of 27.4%), median household income ($70,005 compared to $88,091, a difference of 25.8%), and per capita income ($36,475 compared to $45,840, a difference of 25.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 2.6%), householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $50,355, a difference of 12.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $62,287, a difference of 15.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Lebanese communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.0% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 28.9%), single female poverty (26.3% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 26.5%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 25.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 2.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 3.3%), and single father poverty (19.0% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 7.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Lebanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 22.4%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 15.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.30%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.30%), and unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Lebanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 4.4%), in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 0.62%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Lebanese communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 28.3%), births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 22.8%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 0.070%), average family size (3.19 compared to 3.19, a difference of 0.20%), and family households with children (28.2% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Lebanese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 16.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 11.0%), and no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 0.90%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 57.6%, a difference of 2.5%), and no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 10.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Lebanese communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 49.5%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 44.4%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 36.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (96.7% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.060%), 9th grade (95.5% compared to 95.6%, a difference of 0.10%), and 8th grade (96.4% compared to 96.3%, a difference of 0.13%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Lebanese communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 47.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 43.1%), and hearing disability (4.5% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 39.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 8.9%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 9.3%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 16.9%).