Chickasaw vs Bolivian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Chickasaw
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Bolivian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Chickasaw

Bolivians

Fair
Excellent
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,880
SOCIAL INDEX
86.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
42nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Bolivian Integration in Chickasaw Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 87,869,043 people shows a strong negative correlation between the proportion of Bolivians within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.712. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.046% in Bolivians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to a decrease of 46.4 Bolivians.
Chickasaw Integration in Bolivian Communities

Chickasaw vs Bolivian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Bolivian communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($70,005 compared to $102,195, a difference of 46.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $118,871, a difference of 44.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $109,372, a difference of 40.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 1.4%), median female earnings ($34,414 compared to $43,445, a difference of 26.2%), and median male earnings ($47,832 compared to $61,066, a difference of 27.7%).
Chickasaw vs Bolivian Income
Income MetricChickasawBolivian
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$36,475
Exceptional
$49,526
Median Family Income
Tragic
$85,356
Exceptional
$119,479
Median Household Income
Tragic
$70,005
Exceptional
$102,195
Median Earnings
Tragic
$40,672
Exceptional
$52,005
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$47,832
Exceptional
$61,066
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,414
Exceptional
$43,445
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$44,763
Exceptional
$58,506
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$77,929
Exceptional
$109,372
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$82,193
Exceptional
$118,871
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,732
Exceptional
$74,245
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.2%
Tragic
26.8%

Chickasaw vs Bolivian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Bolivian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 57.9%), child poverty among boys under 16 (19.8% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 49.3%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.0% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 49.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 2.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 9.0%), and married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 26.5%).
Chickasaw vs Bolivian Poverty
Poverty MetricChickasawBolivian
Poverty
Tragic
14.7%
Exceptional
10.4%
Families
Tragic
10.8%
Exceptional
7.5%
Males
Tragic
13.5%
Exceptional
9.4%
Females
Tragic
15.9%
Exceptional
11.5%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
24.5%
Exceptional
17.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.0%
Exceptional
11.4%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
21.8%
Exceptional
13.8%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.5%
Exceptional
13.2%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.8%
Exceptional
13.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.6%
Exceptional
13.6%
Single Males
Tragic
16.3%
Exceptional
11.2%
Single Females
Tragic
26.3%
Exceptional
17.9%
Single Fathers
Tragic
19.0%
Exceptional
14.7%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.4%
Exceptional
25.9%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
4.6%
Seniors Over 65 years
Good
10.7%
Exceptional
9.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
11.4%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.1%
Exceptional
9.3%

Chickasaw vs Bolivian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Bolivian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 27.6%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 19.0%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 0.35%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 0.56%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.58%).
Chickasaw vs Bolivian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricChickasawBolivian
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.8%
Males
Excellent
5.2%
Exceptional
4.7%
Females
Excellent
5.1%
Exceptional
5.0%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.7%
Excellent
17.3%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Exceptional
9.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Fair
6.7%
Exceptional
5.9%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
4.9%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
4.9%
Exceptional
4.1%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
4.1%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Good
4.8%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Good
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.3%
Exceptional
8.0%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.0%
Good
7.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Exceptional
8.5%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.4%
Exceptional
5.1%

Chickasaw vs Bolivian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Bolivian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 68.2%, a difference of 9.5%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 7.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 75.2%, a difference of 1.0%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 5.1%).
Chickasaw vs Bolivian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricChickasawBolivian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
62.3%
Exceptional
68.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
76.2%
Exceptional
81.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.3%
Fair
36.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Poor
74.5%
Good
75.2%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
81.9%
Exceptional
86.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.9%
Exceptional
86.1%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
80.9%
Exceptional
86.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
79.0%
Exceptional
84.9%

Chickasaw vs Bolivian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Bolivian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 27.6%), divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 26.6%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 21.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.19 compared to 3.29, a difference of 3.1%), family households (64.4% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 3.2%), and currently married (46.6% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 3.2%).
Chickasaw vs Bolivian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricChickasawBolivian
Family Households
Good
64.4%
Exceptional
66.5%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.2%
Exceptional
29.5%
Married-couple Households
Fair
45.9%
Exceptional
49.2%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.19
Exceptional
3.29
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.8%
Excellent
2.3%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.0%
Exceptional
5.8%
Currently Married
Average
46.6%
Exceptional
48.1%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
14.2%
Exceptional
11.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.3%
Exceptional
28.5%

Chickasaw vs Bolivian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Bolivian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 9.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 8.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 91.5%, a difference of 0.87%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 58.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 6.6%).
Chickasaw vs Bolivian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricChickasawBolivian
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.9%
Exceptional
8.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.3%
Exceptional
91.5%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.0%
Exceptional
58.3%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.2%
Exceptional
20.8%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.4%
Exceptional
6.8%

Chickasaw vs Bolivian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Bolivian communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.4% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 68.7%), professional degree (3.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 66.9%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 56.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.3% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 0.10%), high school diploma (88.4% compared to 89.1%, a difference of 0.73%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.76%).
Chickasaw vs Bolivian Education Level
Education Level MetricChickasawBolivian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Tragic
2.4%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.6%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.6%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.6%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.5%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.3%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
97.1%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Tragic
96.9%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Tragic
96.5%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Tragic
95.4%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Tragic
95.0%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.5%
Tragic
94.3%
10th Grade
Excellent
94.1%
Tragic
93.2%
11th Grade
Fair
92.3%
Fair
92.2%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.3%
Average
91.2%
High School Diploma
Poor
88.4%
Average
89.1%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.8%
Excellent
86.4%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
60.4%
Exceptional
68.7%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.3%
Exceptional
63.5%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.6%
Exceptional
52.0%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.4%
Exceptional
44.6%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.4%
Exceptional
19.3%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.4%
Exceptional
5.6%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
2.4%

Chickasaw vs Bolivian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Bolivian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 80.2%), hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 72.7%), and vision disability (3.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 71.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 12.3%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 13.3%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 32.3%).
Chickasaw vs Bolivian Disability
Disability MetricChickasawBolivian
Disability
Tragic
15.2%
Exceptional
10.0%
Males
Tragic
15.1%
Exceptional
9.6%
Females
Tragic
15.2%
Exceptional
10.4%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.7%
Exceptional
1.0%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.8%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.0%
Exceptional
5.8%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.1%
Exceptional
8.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
30.2%
Exceptional
21.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
51.2%
Exceptional
45.2%
Vision
Tragic
3.2%
Exceptional
1.9%
Hearing
Tragic
4.5%
Exceptional
2.6%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.5%
Exceptional
16.5%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.0%
Exceptional
5.1%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.9%
Exceptional
2.2%