Chickasaw vs Immigrants from the Azores Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 25,370,331 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from the Azores within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.943. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.211% in Immigrants from the Azores. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 211.4 Immigrants from the Azores.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from the Azores communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $92,322, a difference of 18.5%), householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $52,621, a difference of 17.6%), and median household income ($70,005 compared to $80,357, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 0.020%), householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $52,121, a difference of 3.1%), and per capita income ($36,475 compared to $39,608, a difference of 8.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from the Azores communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 46.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 30.5%), and receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 25.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among boys under 16 (19.8% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 4.5%), family poverty (10.8% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 5.6%), and single mother poverty (34.4% compared to 32.2%, a difference of 6.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from the Azores communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 45.7%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 43.2%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 35.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 2.5%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 2.8%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.3% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 7.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from the Azores communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 41.7%, a difference of 8.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 77.2%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.9% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 0.53%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from the Azores communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 15.6%), births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 39.6%, a difference of 9.0%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.2% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 0.36%), average family size (3.19 compared to 3.21, a difference of 0.67%), and married-couple households (45.9% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from the Azores communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 23.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 56.4%, a difference of 4.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 1.5%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 2.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from the Azores communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 79.4%), professional degree (3.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 18.9%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.5%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.5%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from the Azores communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 31.8%), disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 28.4%), and hearing disability (4.5% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 50.9%, a difference of 0.56%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 1.8%), and female disability (15.2% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 2.4%).