Chickasaw vs Spaniard Community Comparison

COMPARE

Chickasaw
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Spaniard
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Chickasaw

Spaniards

Fair
Fair
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,805
SOCIAL INDEX
35.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
210th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Spaniard Integration in Chickasaw Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 139,594,633 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Spaniards within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.059. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.005% in Spaniards. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 5.1 Spaniards.
Chickasaw Integration in Spaniard Communities

Chickasaw vs Spaniard Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Spaniard communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $99,889, a difference of 21.5%), median household income ($70,005 compared to $84,644, a difference of 20.9%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $93,366, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 0.78%), median female earnings ($34,414 compared to $38,656, a difference of 12.3%), and median earnings ($40,672 compared to $46,059, a difference of 13.2%).
Chickasaw vs Spaniard Income
Income MetricChickasawSpaniard
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$36,475
Fair
$43,028
Median Family Income
Tragic
$85,356
Fair
$101,617
Median Household Income
Tragic
$70,005
Average
$84,644
Median Earnings
Tragic
$40,672
Fair
$46,059
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$47,832
Average
$54,401
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,414
Poor
$38,656
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$44,763
Tragic
$51,117
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$77,929
Fair
$93,366
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$82,193
Average
$99,889
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,732
Average
$60,866
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.2%
Tragic
27.0%

Chickasaw vs Spaniard Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Spaniard communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 20.6%), single female poverty (26.3% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 19.4%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 2.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 4.6%), and married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 7.9%).
Chickasaw vs Spaniard Poverty
Poverty MetricChickasawSpaniard
Poverty
Tragic
14.7%
Poor
12.8%
Families
Tragic
10.8%
Fair
9.4%
Males
Tragic
13.5%
Poor
11.7%
Females
Tragic
15.9%
Poor
13.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
24.5%
Poor
20.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.0%
Tragic
14.6%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
21.8%
Poor
18.1%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.5%
Fair
16.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.8%
Fair
17.1%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.6%
Fair
17.0%
Single Males
Tragic
16.3%
Tragic
13.7%
Single Females
Tragic
26.3%
Tragic
22.0%
Single Fathers
Tragic
19.0%
Tragic
17.2%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.4%
Tragic
30.2%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.8%
Fair
5.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Good
10.7%
Average
10.9%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.6%
Average
12.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.1%
Fair
11.9%

Chickasaw vs Spaniard Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Spaniard communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 21.1%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 19.2%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.7%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.3%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 2.4%).
Chickasaw vs Spaniard Unemployment
Unemployment MetricChickasawSpaniard
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Average
5.3%
Males
Excellent
5.2%
Fair
5.3%
Females
Excellent
5.1%
Fair
5.3%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.2%
Fair
11.7%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.7%
Average
17.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Good
10.3%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Fair
6.7%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.2%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
4.9%
Poor
4.8%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Average
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Good
4.8%
Fair
4.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Fair
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
5.5%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
5.2%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.3%
Fair
8.9%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.0%
Fair
7.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Tragic
9.2%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.4%
Fair
5.6%

Chickasaw vs Spaniard Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Spaniard communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 3.1%), in labor force | age 35-44 (80.9% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 0.92%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 2.1%).
Chickasaw vs Spaniard Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricChickasawSpaniard
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
62.3%
Tragic
64.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
76.2%
Tragic
78.4%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.3%
Exceptional
38.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Poor
74.5%
Excellent
75.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
81.9%
Tragic
83.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.9%
Tragic
83.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
80.9%
Tragic
83.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
79.0%
Tragic
81.5%

Chickasaw vs Spaniard Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Spaniard communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 12.0%), single father households (2.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 10.7%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.6% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 0.40%), family households with children (28.2% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 0.79%), and family households (64.4% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 1.1%).
Chickasaw vs Spaniard Family Structure
Family Structure MetricChickasawSpaniard
Family Households
Good
64.4%
Exceptional
65.1%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.2%
Exceptional
28.0%
Married-couple Households
Fair
45.9%
Excellent
47.2%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.19
Average
3.23
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.8%
Tragic
2.5%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.0%
Fair
6.5%
Currently Married
Average
46.6%
Average
46.8%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
14.2%
Tragic
12.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.3%
Tragic
33.6%

Chickasaw vs Spaniard Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Spaniard communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 6.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 2.3%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 0.52%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 0.30%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 0.51%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 0.52%).
Chickasaw vs Spaniard Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricChickasawSpaniard
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.9%
Exceptional
8.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.3%
Exceptional
91.8%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.0%
Exceptional
59.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.2%
Exceptional
22.3%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.4%
Exceptional
7.6%

Chickasaw vs Spaniard Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Spaniard communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 31.5%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 28.2%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 24.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.3% compared to 92.5%, a difference of 0.16%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.24%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.25%).
Chickasaw vs Spaniard Education Level
Education Level MetricChickasawSpaniard
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Exceptional
1.9%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.1%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.1%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.0%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Excellent
97.9%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Excellent
97.7%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Excellent
97.5%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Excellent
97.2%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Good
96.1%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Good
95.8%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.5%
Average
94.9%
10th Grade
Excellent
94.1%
Average
93.7%
11th Grade
Fair
92.3%
Average
92.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.3%
Fair
91.0%
High School Diploma
Poor
88.4%
Average
89.1%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.8%
Fair
85.4%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
60.4%
Average
65.3%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.3%
Fair
59.0%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.6%
Fair
45.2%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.4%
Fair
36.6%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.4%
Fair
14.6%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.4%
Average
4.4%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Good
1.9%

Chickasaw vs Spaniard Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Spaniard communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 31.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 31.4%), and hearing disability (4.5% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 28.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 6.5%), cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 6.8%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 11.6%).
Chickasaw vs Spaniard Disability
Disability MetricChickasawSpaniard
Disability
Tragic
15.2%
Tragic
12.5%
Males
Tragic
15.1%
Tragic
12.3%
Females
Tragic
15.2%
Tragic
12.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.7%
Tragic
1.4%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.8%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.0%
Tragic
7.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.1%
Tragic
12.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
30.2%
Tragic
24.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
51.2%
Tragic
48.1%
Vision
Tragic
3.2%
Tragic
2.4%
Hearing
Tragic
4.5%
Tragic
3.5%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.5%
Average
17.3%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.0%
Tragic
6.5%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.9%
Tragic
2.6%