Tongan vs Immigrants from China Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 100,465,235 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China within Tongan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.179. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tongans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.087% in Immigrants from China. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Tongans corresponds to a decrease of 87.4 Immigrants from China.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Tongan and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($41,693 compared to $54,264, a difference of 30.1%), median male earnings ($53,218 compared to $67,353, a difference of 26.6%), and median earnings ($45,665 compared to $56,638, a difference of 24.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($68,235 compared to $69,174, a difference of 1.4%), householder income under 25 years ($56,972 compared to $57,931, a difference of 1.7%), and wage/income gap (27.5% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Tongan and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.5% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 26.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.3% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 23.3%), and single father poverty (12.2% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 22.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 16 (13.4% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 0.94%), child poverty among girls under 16 (13.6% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and receiving food stamps (9.7% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Tongan and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 33.6%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 16.1%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (6.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 5.6%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.9% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 6.1%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 6.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Tongan and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.2% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 32.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.9% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 9.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (67.5% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.050%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.1% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.060%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.3% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.73%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Tongan and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 36.5%), single mother households (5.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 15.5%), and births to unmarried women (28.4% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.3% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 1.0%), married-couple households (51.6% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 6.5%), and family households (69.6% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 7.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Tongan and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 111.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (10.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 66.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.5% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 45.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.9% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 9.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (63.5% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 23.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.5% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 45.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Tongan and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 81.1%), doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 79.2%), and master's degree (12.5% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 69.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (95.1% compared to 95.0%, a difference of 0.080%), 11th grade (92.2% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.080%), and 7th grade (95.4% compared to 95.3%, a difference of 0.090%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Tongan and Immigrants from China communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 0.96%, a difference of 37.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.5% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 20.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.4%), disability age over 75 (48.3% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 4.4%), and self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 4.8%).