Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Kazakhstan Community Comparison

COMPARE

Chickasaw
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Kazakhstan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Chickasaw

Immigrants from Kazakhstan

Fair
Good
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,490
SOCIAL INDEX
72.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
115th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Kazakhstan Integration in Chickasaw Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 68,749,000 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Kazakhstan within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.749. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.053% in Immigrants from Kazakhstan. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 53.2 Immigrants from Kazakhstan.
Chickasaw Integration in Immigrants from Kazakhstan Communities

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Kazakhstan Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Kazakhstan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,475 compared to $48,747, a difference of 33.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $107,378, a difference of 30.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $101,727, a difference of 30.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 4.4%), householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $62,292, a difference of 15.9%), and householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $53,990, a difference of 20.6%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Kazakhstan Income
Income MetricChickasawImmigrants from Kazakhstan
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$36,475
Exceptional
$48,747
Median Family Income
Tragic
$85,356
Exceptional
$110,137
Median Household Income
Tragic
$70,005
Exceptional
$91,015
Median Earnings
Tragic
$40,672
Exceptional
$50,225
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$47,832
Exceptional
$59,278
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,414
Exceptional
$42,386
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$44,763
Exceptional
$53,990
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$77,929
Exceptional
$101,727
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$82,193
Exceptional
$107,378
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,732
Excellent
$62,292
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.2%
Fair
26.0%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Kazakhstan Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Kazakhstan communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 38.2%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.0% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 36.9%), and single male poverty (16.3% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 33.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 3.2%), married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 10.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 11.3%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Kazakhstan Poverty
Poverty MetricChickasawImmigrants from Kazakhstan
Poverty
Tragic
14.7%
Good
12.0%
Families
Tragic
10.8%
Excellent
8.5%
Males
Tragic
13.5%
Good
11.0%
Females
Tragic
15.9%
Good
13.0%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
24.5%
Average
20.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.0%
Exceptional
12.4%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
21.8%
Exceptional
15.8%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.5%
Exceptional
15.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.8%
Excellent
15.5%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.6%
Exceptional
15.1%
Single Males
Tragic
16.3%
Exceptional
12.2%
Single Females
Tragic
26.3%
Exceptional
20.0%
Single Fathers
Tragic
19.0%
Exceptional
15.6%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.4%
Exceptional
28.2%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.8%
Average
5.2%
Seniors Over 65 years
Good
10.7%
Average
11.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
13.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.1%
Excellent
11.1%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Kazakhstan Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Kazakhstan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 24.5%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 12.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.27%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.3%), and male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.3%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Kazakhstan Unemployment
Unemployment MetricChickasawImmigrants from Kazakhstan
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Good
5.2%
Males
Excellent
5.2%
Average
5.3%
Females
Excellent
5.1%
Excellent
5.1%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.2%
Good
11.5%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.7%
Poor
18.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Good
10.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Fair
6.7%
Excellent
6.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.2%
Fair
5.5%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
4.9%
Excellent
4.5%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Excellent
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Good
4.8%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.3%
Exceptional
8.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.0%
Exceptional
7.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Fair
9.1%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.4%
Average
5.4%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Kazakhstan Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Kazakhstan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 35.2%, a difference of 9.0%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 5.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 0.86%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 4.1%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Kazakhstan Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricChickasawImmigrants from Kazakhstan
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
62.3%
Good
65.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
76.2%
Good
79.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.3%
Tragic
35.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Poor
74.5%
Tragic
73.8%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
81.9%
Poor
84.4%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.9%
Exceptional
85.3%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
80.9%
Good
84.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
79.0%
Excellent
83.0%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Kazakhstan Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Kazakhstan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 36.5%), births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 29.1%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 25.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.19 compared to 3.17, a difference of 0.66%), currently married (46.6% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 1.8%), and married-couple households (45.9% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 2.0%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Kazakhstan Family Structure
Family Structure MetricChickasawImmigrants from Kazakhstan
Family Households
Good
64.4%
Tragic
63.1%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.2%
Tragic
26.9%
Married-couple Households
Fair
45.9%
Good
46.8%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.19
Tragic
3.17
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.8%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.0%
Exceptional
5.6%
Currently Married
Average
46.6%
Excellent
47.4%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
14.2%
Exceptional
11.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.3%
Exceptional
28.1%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Kazakhstan Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Kazakhstan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 72.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 35.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 27.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 86.6%, a difference of 6.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 51.6%, a difference of 14.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 27.6%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Kazakhstan Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricChickasawImmigrants from Kazakhstan
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.9%
Tragic
13.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.3%
Tragic
86.6%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.0%
Tragic
51.6%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.2%
Tragic
17.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.4%
Tragic
5.5%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Kazakhstan Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Kazakhstan communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 63.3%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 57.4%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 50.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (94.1% compared to 94.1%, a difference of 0.040%), 9th grade (95.5% compared to 95.1%, a difference of 0.43%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.45%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Kazakhstan Education Level
Education Level MetricChickasawImmigrants from Kazakhstan
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Average
2.1%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.4%
Fair
97.9%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.4%
Fair
97.9%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Fair
97.9%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Fair
97.8%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Fair
97.7%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Average
97.5%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Average
97.3%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Average
97.0%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Good
96.1%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Good
95.9%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.5%
Good
95.1%
10th Grade
Excellent
94.1%
Excellent
94.1%
11th Grade
Fair
92.3%
Exceptional
93.1%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.3%
Exceptional
91.9%
High School Diploma
Poor
88.4%
Exceptional
90.0%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.8%
Exceptional
87.0%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
60.4%
Exceptional
69.2%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.3%
Exceptional
63.6%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.6%
Exceptional
51.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.4%
Exceptional
43.4%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.4%
Exceptional
18.0%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.4%
Exceptional
5.5%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
2.3%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Kazakhstan Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Kazakhstan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 61.6%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 59.9%), and vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 57.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 7.9%), cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 8.1%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 15.7%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Kazakhstan Disability
Disability MetricChickasawImmigrants from Kazakhstan
Disability
Tragic
15.2%
Exceptional
11.3%
Males
Tragic
15.1%
Exceptional
10.7%
Females
Tragic
15.2%
Exceptional
11.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.7%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.8%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.0%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.1%
Exceptional
10.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
30.2%
Exceptional
22.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
51.2%
Average
47.4%
Vision
Tragic
3.2%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Tragic
4.5%
Good
2.9%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.5%
Excellent
17.1%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.0%
Excellent
5.9%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.9%
Average
2.5%