Chickasaw vs Belizean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 79,055,572 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Belizeans within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.742. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.102% in Belizeans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 101.6 Belizeans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Belizean communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 27.9%), householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $51,094, a difference of 14.1%), and median household income ($70,005 compared to $77,028, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($47,832 compared to $48,358, a difference of 1.1%), householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $54,580, a difference of 1.6%), and median earnings ($40,672 compared to $42,702, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Belizean communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 27.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 26.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 21.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among boys under 16 (19.8% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 0.36%), female poverty (15.9% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 0.50%), and poverty (14.7% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Belizean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.7% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 29.4%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 27.4%), and unemployment (5.0% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 26.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 5.4%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 6.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Belizean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 32.8%, a difference of 17.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.9% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 73.4%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Belizean communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 17.3%), currently married (46.6% compared to 42.2%, a difference of 10.5%), and married-couple households (45.9% compared to 42.2%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 0.55%), family households with children (28.2% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 1.6%), and births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 37.0%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Belizean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 82.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 19.6%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 18.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 85.7%, a difference of 7.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 51.0%, a difference of 15.6%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 18.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Belizean communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 77.3%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 8.7%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (60.4% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 0.59%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.4%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Belizean communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 62.2%), disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 49.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 40.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 2.9%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 49.4%, a difference of 3.6%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 4.3%).