Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Eritrea Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 66,231,433 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Eritrea within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.569. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.234% in Immigrants from Eritrea. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 233.8 Immigrants from Eritrea.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Eritrea communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 26.7%), per capita income ($36,475 compared to $44,509, a difference of 22.0%), and median household income ($70,005 compared to $85,025, a difference of 21.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $60,096, a difference of 11.8%), median male earnings ($47,832 compared to $53,715, a difference of 12.3%), and householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $51,574, a difference of 15.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Eritrea communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.3% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 34.9%), single father poverty (19.0% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 28.1%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.0% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 23.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 2.0%), child poverty under the age of 16 (19.5% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 5.0%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (19.6% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Eritrea communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 31.2%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 28.2%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.16%), unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.19%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 0.76%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Eritrea communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 68.9%, a difference of 10.5%), in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 6.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 0.94%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 85.7%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Eritrea communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 17.1%), births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 14.6%), and single father households (2.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.2% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 1.6%), average family size (3.19 compared to 3.24, a difference of 1.7%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Eritrea communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 34.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 27.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 24.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 89.4%, a difference of 3.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 12.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 24.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Eritrea communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 63.6%), professional degree (3.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 43.8%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 43.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (90.3% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 0.51%), ged/equivalency (83.8% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.57%), and high school diploma (88.4% compared to 87.8%, a difference of 0.74%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Eritrea communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 65.8%), vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 56.9%), and disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 48.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 0.94%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 7.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 28.3%).