Chickasaw vs Immigrants from West Indies Community Comparison

COMPARE

Chickasaw
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlbanianAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from West Indies
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Chickasaw

Immigrants from West Indies

Fair
Tragic
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,212
SOCIAL INDEX
9.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
318th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from West Indies Integration in Chickasaw Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 43,914,444 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from West Indies within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.628% in Immigrants from West Indies. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 627.6 Immigrants from West Indies.
Chickasaw Integration in Immigrants from West Indies Communities

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from West Indies Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from West Indies communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 41.2%), householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $51,479, a difference of 15.0%), and median female earnings ($34,414 compared to $39,441, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $54,927, a difference of 2.2%), median male earnings ($47,832 compared to $49,271, a difference of 3.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $88,164, a difference of 7.3%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from West Indies Income
Income MetricChickasawImmigrants from West Indies
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$36,475
Tragic
$40,763
Median Family Income
Tragic
$85,356
Tragic
$91,588
Median Household Income
Tragic
$70,005
Tragic
$77,956
Median Earnings
Tragic
$40,672
Tragic
$43,989
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$47,832
Tragic
$49,271
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,414
Fair
$39,441
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$44,763
Poor
$51,479
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$77,929
Tragic
$87,063
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$82,193
Tragic
$88,164
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,732
Tragic
$54,927
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.2%
Exceptional
19.2%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from West Indies Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from West Indies communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 35.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 32.7%), and single male poverty (16.3% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 26.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (13.5% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 0.070%), poverty (14.7% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 0.96%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (19.8% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 1.0%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from West Indies Poverty
Poverty MetricChickasawImmigrants from West Indies
Poverty
Tragic
14.7%
Tragic
14.8%
Families
Tragic
10.8%
Tragic
11.3%
Males
Tragic
13.5%
Tragic
13.5%
Females
Tragic
15.9%
Tragic
16.1%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
24.5%
Tragic
21.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.0%
Tragic
15.1%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
21.8%
Tragic
20.7%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.5%
Tragic
20.2%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.8%
Tragic
20.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.6%
Tragic
20.7%
Single Males
Tragic
16.3%
Fair
12.9%
Single Females
Tragic
26.3%
Tragic
22.5%
Single Fathers
Tragic
19.0%
Exceptional
15.9%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.4%
Tragic
31.1%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
6.2%
Seniors Over 65 years
Good
10.7%
Tragic
14.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
15.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.1%
Tragic
16.1%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from West Indies Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from West Indies communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.7% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 33.3%), male unemployment (5.2% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 28.8%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 27.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 0.91%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 3.7%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 4.2%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from West Indies Unemployment
Unemployment MetricChickasawImmigrants from West Indies
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
6.3%
Males
Excellent
5.2%
Tragic
6.7%
Females
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
6.1%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
14.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.7%
Tragic
22.2%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Tragic
12.3%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Fair
6.7%
Tragic
7.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.2%
Tragic
6.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
4.9%
Tragic
5.6%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
5.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Good
4.8%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
5.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
5.7%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.3%
Exceptional
8.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.0%
Tragic
9.0%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Average
9.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.4%
Tragic
6.6%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from West Indies Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from West Indies communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 20.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 5.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.9% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 2.8%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 3.1%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from West Indies Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricChickasawImmigrants from West Indies
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
62.3%
Exceptional
65.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
76.2%
Tragic
78.9%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.3%
Tragic
31.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Poor
74.5%
Tragic
72.4%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
81.9%
Tragic
84.2%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.9%
Poor
84.5%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
80.9%
Fair
84.3%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
79.0%
Tragic
81.5%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from West Indies Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from West Indies communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 20.5%), married-couple households (45.9% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 17.8%), and currently married (46.6% compared to 40.7%, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.19 compared to 3.33, a difference of 4.4%), family households (64.4% compared to 61.6%, a difference of 4.5%), and births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 6.3%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from West Indies Family Structure
Family Structure MetricChickasawImmigrants from West Indies
Family Households
Good
64.4%
Tragic
61.6%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.2%
Tragic
25.7%
Married-couple Households
Fair
45.9%
Tragic
39.0%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.19
Exceptional
3.33
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.8%
Good
2.3%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.0%
Tragic
7.9%
Currently Married
Average
46.6%
Tragic
40.7%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
14.2%
Tragic
12.5%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.3%
Tragic
38.6%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from West Indies Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from West Indies communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 161.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 56.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 51.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 16.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 43.1%, a difference of 36.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 51.7%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from West Indies Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricChickasawImmigrants from West Indies
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.9%
Tragic
20.5%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.3%
Tragic
79.5%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.0%
Tragic
43.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.2%
Tragic
14.6%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.4%
Tragic
4.7%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from West Indies Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from West Indies communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 56.7%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 21.4%), and professional degree (3.4% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (60.4% compared to 60.6%, a difference of 0.33%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 0.74%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 1.0%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from West Indies Education Level
Education Level MetricChickasawImmigrants from West Indies
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Tragic
2.7%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.4%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.3%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.3%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.2%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.1%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
96.7%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Tragic
96.5%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Tragic
96.1%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Tragic
94.8%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Tragic
94.3%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.5%
Tragic
93.3%
10th Grade
Excellent
94.1%
Tragic
91.8%
11th Grade
Fair
92.3%
Tragic
90.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.3%
Tragic
88.6%
High School Diploma
Poor
88.4%
Tragic
86.2%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.8%
Tragic
82.4%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
60.4%
Tragic
60.6%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.3%
Tragic
55.2%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.6%
Tragic
42.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.4%
Tragic
34.6%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.4%
Tragic
13.9%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.4%
Tragic
4.0%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Tragic
1.5%

Chickasaw vs Immigrants from West Indies Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from West Indies communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 77.6%), disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 50.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 49.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 1.9%), self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 2.4%), and disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 48.9%, a difference of 4.7%).
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from West Indies Disability
Disability MetricChickasawImmigrants from West Indies
Disability
Tragic
15.2%
Fair
11.9%
Males
Tragic
15.1%
Good
11.1%
Females
Tragic
15.2%
Tragic
12.6%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.7%
Exceptional
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.8%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.0%
Exceptional
6.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.1%
Tragic
11.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
30.2%
Poor
23.9%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
51.2%
Tragic
48.9%
Vision
Tragic
3.2%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Tragic
4.5%
Exceptional
2.5%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.5%
Tragic
18.1%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.0%
Tragic
6.7%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.9%
Tragic
2.8%