Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Cambodia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 94,181,088 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Cambodia within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.395. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.129% in Immigrants from Cambodia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 129.4 Immigrants from Cambodia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($70,005 compared to $83,304, a difference of 19.0%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $91,533, a difference of 17.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $96,537, a difference of 17.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $57,580, a difference of 7.2%), median male earnings ($47,832 compared to $51,594, a difference of 7.9%), and per capita income ($36,475 compared to $40,434, a difference of 10.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 30.3%), single male poverty (16.3% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 28.3%), and single father poverty (19.0% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 26.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 2.8%), receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 6.0%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (19.6% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 8.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 20.6%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 17.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.25%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 1.4%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 5.9%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 19.9%), currently married (46.6% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 4.7%), and average family size (3.19 compared to 3.33, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 1.6%), married-couple households (45.9% compared to 44.9%, a difference of 2.3%), and family households with children (28.2% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 29.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 5.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 0.70%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 2.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 106.3%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 12.9%), and bachelor's degree (30.4% compared to 34.2%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 1.3%), college, under 1 year (60.4% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 1.7%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.5% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 51.6%), disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 47.9%), and vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 37.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 2.1%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 50.0%, a difference of 2.4%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 7.6%).